|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Related Articles More on Regime Change in Syria
by Daniel Pipes http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2011/05/more-on-regime-change-in-syria Translations of this item: Several points were too bulky to fit into the main body of my column today, "Fin de Régime in Syria?" so I include them here: (1) My title intentionally echoes one in Foreign Policy magazine from Summer 1980, "Dateline Syria: Fin de Régime?" Yes, I know: Stanley F. Reed III jumped the gun by (at least) 31 years but that does not deter me from repeating his quasi-prediction of the Assad demise. (2) Contradictory Iranian and Turkish advice to Assad foreshadows the larger differences ahead between the two Islamist powers. Whereas the Iranians counseled Assad violently to repress the protesters and actually helped him do so, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan advised Assad that "responding to the people's years-old demands positively, with a reformist approach, would help Syria overcome the problems more easily." He even got into details: one newspaper report indicates he told the Syrians "to increase the effectiveness of public services, ensure a more transparent economy and public tendering process and restrain the security forces." (Those are not exactly the priorities I would stress.) Contradictory Iranian and Turkish tactics point to looming tensions between the Islamist 1.0 and 2.0 regimes. (3) The Assad government insists that the street protestors are Salafis, or violent Islamists, and that it is protecting the country from them. As one pro-government politician put it, the regime cannot permit "some people announce a Salafi emirate in Dara'a. This is not Afghanistan." Salafis and other Islamists are indeed a great danger in the Middle East but, as in Libya, they are far from the mainstay of the opposition. (4) Vogue magazine is unrepentant, even defiant, about its wretched story on Bashar al-Assad's wife Asma. In an interview, Vogue senior editor Chris Knutsen justified the glamorization of tyranny, explaining,
(6) Assad relies increasingly on his Alawi power base. Note an analysis on this topic by Khaled Yacoub Oweis for Reuters:
Oweis explains how Alawis rose in the army during French rule and eventually took power in 1966. He quotes a former member of the army's personnel division saying that "an Alawite captain has more say than a Sunni general." Further,
Comment: For the fifteen year period that I worked intensively on Syria, 1985-2000, I emphasized this sectarian divide. See in particular two of my studies from then: "The Alawi Capture of Power in Syria" (1989), which explains how a small and historically weak community reached the top and "Syria After Asad" (1987), which predicted the ethnic divide now coming into sight. (May 24, 2011) Related Topics: Syria receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. Comment on this item
|
|
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||