	Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site
Home \| Articles \| Blog \| Reviews \| Search

Samir Kuntar, Back in Lebanon

by Daniel Pipes
July 22, 2008

Send

RSS

This weblog follows the career of the worst terrorist ever freed by the Israeli authorities, and builds on my article "Samir Kuntar and the Last Laugh."

Shlomo Avineri and I don't usually agree, but he has an article in Ha'aretz today, "The state, not the families," that builds nicely on my characterization of Israel as "a once-formidably strategic country has degenerated into a supremely sentimental country, a rudderless polity where self-absorbed egoism trumps raison d'être."

Anyone looking in from the outside at the emotional turmoil and media circus surrounding the return of the bodies of Eldad Regev and Ehud Goldwasser would likely have concluded that Israel is run not by the government but by families worried about the fate of their loved ones. Since the matter of [Hamas hostage] Gilad Shalit has still not been solved, it is worth returning some sanity to the public debate, and not to repeat our mistakes.

Shalit's return is not a primary strategic challenge for Israel. Israel has a clear responsibility to bring him home, but it also has a more important commitment to protect its citizens from rocket and mortar fire, because an entire region and tens of thousands of people are suffering from these attacks and the terror they bring. And the state is responsible for defending them.

Hamas' control of Gaza, and not Shalit's abduction, which is one of its consequences, is the strategic challenge facing Israel. There is no easy answer to this challenge, which is characterized by an extremist group committed to Israel's destruction only a stone's throw from Israeli population centers. It also includes the never-ending attacks on Israeli towns, and the links between Hamas and Iran - and its threats.

The press, and in particular the electronic media, has a clear tendency to personalize the situation and turn it into a heart-rending story. Matters of principle and reality attract less attention than another interview with family members or their supporters. The deterioration of the debate over a difficult strategic issue to the level of a soap opera is worrying and outrageous. After all, it is clear that plucking away time after time on the strings of the families' distress only strengthens Hamas: Every appearance of a family member on television - and it makes no difference what they say - is another victory for Hamas' brutal tactics of extortion. The family members should think about this. …

The way Israel deals with the strategic challenge of Hamas has effects far beyond Gilad Shalit's personal fate. The cabinet must have the courage to tell the public this, and the family, too, despite all the pain. After all, the state sends its soldiers off to battle knowing the risks to their lives. It is critical to understand that policy is set by the state, not the families.

(July 22, 2008)

July 23, 2008 update: Kuntar has vowed to fight for Hezbullah and kill more Israelis, MEMRI documents today.

July 28, 2008 update: The above article inspired a criticism by Yoram Schweitzer that the Jerusalem Post published on July 24. I reply to Schweitzer today, again in the Jerusalem Post, in "May an American Comment on Israel?"

Aug. 3, 2008 update: Schweitzer has again critiqued me, to which I have commented at "A Final Reply to Yoram Schweitzer."

Sep. 2, 2008 update: "Samir Kuntar: I met with Abbas in Beirut at his request" reads the Associated Press headline. One may not need more evidence of the character and politics of Mahmoud Abbas, but this supplies it anyway.

For this, Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert pathetically rebuked Abbas, telling Abbas: "You are not a man of terror, and I didn't expect you to meet with such a despicable killer as him." To which, Abbas replied that the meeting was unplanned. Olmert retorted that Abbas still need not have met Kuntar.

Oct. 23, 2008 update: More news from this delightful individual who says he is more committed than ever to eliminating the Jewish state. "As long as there is something called Israel in this region, the resistance must continue ... and I am totally committed to the resistance. I am ready to take part in any resistance mission." In Hizbullah-speak, of course, resistance means terrorism. "The resistance will end only when the Zionist entity disappears."

Related Topics: Arab-Israel conflict & diplomacy, Lebanon, Terrorism receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.