Islamists Boycott the White House

A little-known organization, the Los Angeles-based "Project Islamic H.O.P.E.," grandly announced on Oct. 21 (along with several other equally obscure groups: the Muslim Electorate's Council of America; The ILM Foundation; Masjid Ibaadillah) that it is boycotting President George W. Bush's 2003 Ramadan dinner at the White House. Or as it more colorfully put it, "Let President Bush eat by himself at his Ramadan dinner." Al-Jazeera's website today quotes the project's director, Imam Naji Ali, explaining that he took this step because he is "fed up with Bush's 'anti-Muslim' policies." (The first of those policies mentioned, incidentally, is my appointment to the U.S. Institute of Peace.) This news prompts two reflections:

1. My sources in the White House tell me that Imam Naji Ali was not invited to the Ramadan dinner, called the iftar, in the first place (only diplomats are invited this year). Philosophical query: is it possible to boycott a party to which one was not invited?
2. This is a good precedent; I hope other Islamist organizations should follow suit and publicly exclude themselves from U.S. government-sponsored iftars, thereby providing an opening for moderate Muslims to fill. (October 23, 2003)

Oct. 29, 2003 update: Confirming the illogicality of Naji Ali's "boycotting" a dinner to which he was not invited, another Islamist leader not invited to the iftar, Mahdi Bray of the Muslim American Society, responded to his exclusion by stating that he does not want to give the president "a photo op to the Muslim world saying all is right with Muslims in America. All is not right. Our community is not on sale for dinners or anything else."

Mar. 27, 2009 update: American Islamist organizations have again returned to this pattern, as David J. Rusin explains:

A coalition of Muslim groups, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), has threatened to suspend outreach efforts with the FBI following news of the agency planting informants in California mosques. That the man under investigation has been charged with a host of crimes and allegedly was recorded discussing jihad is apparently irrelevant. According to the coalition, the FBI has lost the trust of Muslims by seeding mosques with "agents provocateurs."

Rusin goes on to note the irony that, with this move, "CAIR might cut off the FBI after the FBI cut off CAIR."

Related Topics:  Radical Islam receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.