Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Fatah and Hamas: Flip Sides of Same Arab Imperialism and Genocidalism
Reader comment on item: Two Palestines, Anyone?

Submitted by G. Marcus (United States), Jun 19, 2007 at 23:27

HAMAS: GENOCIDALISM "HERE AND NOW"

Hamas ideology is immutably founded on 14-centuries of Jihadist dogma, according to which the waging a Holy War of Extermination (Jihad) against Infidel nations is every Muslim's command, with Infidels to be given 3 choices:

(a) Embrace Islam;
(b) Submit to Islamic rule as oppressed Dhimmi minority ("One State
Solution");
(c) Endless war until under threat of destruction.

The only tolerated peace with Infidels is a temporary truce (Hudna), which Arab Jihadists are allowed for up to 10 years, until they get stronger and are able to stage more a decisive assault (back to Sq. 1!).

A territory that is conquered by the forces of Islam at any given time in history - such as Israel/Palestine - is considered "Dar-el-Islam" (Realm of Islam), and is held by its Muslim ruler in trust as a "wakf" from Allah. The ruler is not permitted to concede a square inch of it to any Infidel enemy, unless he is faced with no other choice as a result of military defeat.

Arab leaders know well that, if they break above Sharia dogma, their verdict is certain death - see Abdullah I of Jordan, Anwar Sadat, or what Arafat said he was afraid of at Camp David II.

Hamas's "immediate" genocidalism is summarized in its charter as follows:
"Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will
OBLITERATE it, just as it obliterated others before it."
http://www.mideastweb.org/hamas.htm

FATAH: "STAGED" GENOCIDALISM

Fatah's roots lie in the secular, Pan-Arabist Baath movement, which in our day has morphed into none other than an Arab variety of National-Socialism.

Fatah's guiding strategy is based on the 1974 PLO "Phased Plan" for the destruction of Israel, whereby Fatah will accept any territory it can obtain in Israel/Palestine, with the sole purpose of staging more lethal attacks on the Jewish state, until its final destruction.

Accordingly, as part of the "Peace" Process, Fatah is willing to recognize only a Jewish state that commits:

(a) MILITARY SUICIDE by retreating to indefensible pre-1967 armistice lines, and

(b) DEMOGRAPHIC SUICIDE by flooding itself with Arab settlers though a "right of return" for refugees.

And until then, the Fatah "Peace" Process incorporates nothing but incessant Arab terrorism and rocket attacks on Israel.

The outline of the "Phased Plan" can be summarized as follows:

- Through the "armed struggle" (i.e., terrorism), to establish an "independent combatant national authority" over any territory that is "liberated" from Israeli rule. (Article 2)
- To continue the struggle against Israel, using the territory of the national authority as a base of operations. (Article 4)
- To provoke an all-out war in which Israel's Arab neighbors destroy it entirely ("liberate all Palestinian territory"). (Article 8)
http://www.netaxs.com/~iris/plophase.htm

Fatah's "staged" genocidalism is based summed up by Article 12 of its charter, which outlines the organization's goals regarding Israel:
The Goals: Article (12): COMPLETE LIBERATION of Palestine, and
ERADICATION of Zionist economic, political, military and cultural
EXISTENCE.
http://www.fateh.net/e_public/constitution.htm

CONCLUSION

If Israel had to pick one of its two genocidal enemies, my preference by far would be Hamas.

Hamas, due to its Islamist dogma, is at least straightforward and unable to hide its genocidal goals with a deceptive cloak.

Fatah, on the other hand, has developed excellent political skills in the course of past decades and learned to hide its underlying genocidal goals by way of well-orchestrated deceptions.

As attested by the Oslo process and its aftermath, Fatah's deceptions have proven particularly effective in feeding on the naive peace desires of significant political segments within Israel, as well as the Western world.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (98) on this item

Title By Date
Correction: 3 Palestines: [26 words]M EAug 18, 2007 19:16
Palestinian Shell Game [245 words]DebbieJul 17, 2007 16:26
Poor Mickey Mouse [78 words]BlackspeareJul 5, 2007 20:42
Islamist Mental Disability [185 words]YnnatchkahJul 3, 2007 02:44
Gaza, the new Sudetenland redux [74 words]Jorgen GoderstadJun 27, 2007 12:37
Gaza Strip-tease [136 words]Thomas Justin KazeJun 26, 2007 02:11
both hamas and fatah wish to see Israel destroyed [121 words]Phil GreendJun 25, 2007 21:26
Shut down the "Mosques.! [40 words]Tony DinesJul 25, 2007 20:16
Poll Shows Palestinians want Israel "occupying" Gaza Again. [447 words]YnnatchkahJun 25, 2007 02:44
I really have to laugh [74 words]Seamus MacNemiJul 2, 2007 02:47
You are right, Seamus MacNemi [37 words]YnnatchkahJul 2, 2007 21:36
Atificial state [245 words]DallasJun 24, 2007 23:14
Great summary [64 words]Salomon BenzimraJun 23, 2007 23:05
Fantasy land [121 words]arthurJun 22, 2007 15:04
Strange Bedfellows II [103 words]BlackspeareJun 22, 2007 10:01
Strange Bedfellows? [82 words]BlackspeareJun 21, 2007 08:58
Two Palestines, Anyone? [57 words]S.C.PandaJun 21, 2007 05:33
Two Palestines, Anyone? [826 words]Ed Melik, Esq.Jun 23, 2007 01:15
Pipes points were vindicated [255 words]Amitabh TripathiJun 21, 2007 03:53
Two Palestines, Anyone? [3898 words]Ed Melik, Esq.Jun 21, 2007 03:14
Palestinians are Sowing what they Reaped [273 words]Mel LarawayJun 23, 2007 15:29
Dear Ed Melik, Esq., why did you leave out Egypt from this puzzle? [307 words]MosheJun 24, 2007 04:43
Ed Melik's rewrites history [703 words]InfidelJun 24, 2007 15:05
Palestinians are reaping what they sowed [153 words]MosheJun 24, 2007 15:18
perpetual refugees.. [72 words]donvanJun 25, 2007 11:34
No more blame game, enough with the violence [523 words]Bryan JacksonJun 26, 2007 21:56
Two Palestines, anyone? [614 words]Ed Melik, Esq.Jul 1, 2007 14:50
That's quite a schpiel Mr. Malik [180 words]Seamus MacNemiJul 2, 2007 03:59
Hamas & Fatah; Confusing the European Elite [90 words]David P.Jun 20, 2007 23:51
Actually, that would be three "Palestines" now [6 words]DanJun 20, 2007 14:11
Actually, it is four Palestinian States [175 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDJun 20, 2007 16:02
Yuval, please don't try to scare us. [261 words]MosheJun 25, 2007 15:22
Baruch haShem, eh Moishe? [17 words]Seamus MacNemiJul 2, 2007 04:27
Nobody wants a Palestinian State in the Middle East--except George Bush [702 words]Martin KesslerJun 20, 2007 11:57
Here We Go Again [125 words]BlackspeareJun 20, 2007 11:32
poor Israeli Jews will be sandwiched between Islamic Jehad , Muslim Fatah and Jehadi Hamas ! [97 words]ConcernsJun 20, 2007 09:50
Hamas, Fata, Islami Jihad, Hezbolla - All jumping and screaming because they are not afraid of Israel [147 words]James BurkeJun 20, 2007 20:35
ok right... [70 words]Hamri Al-AssadJun 21, 2007 21:58
Why are you jealous of Israel Money and Resources [44 words]HirooJun 23, 2007 06:39
Send Jimmy [85 words]LDCJun 20, 2007 08:10
Would Mr Pipes or readers help me clarify these questions? Thank you! [265 words]TammyJun 20, 2007 02:29
'Palestinian Roulette' - Opinion for Tammy - Who's on First. [597 words]M. ToveyJun 20, 2007 16:36
Tammy - a few thoughts [562 words]PatJun 20, 2007 16:56
Tammy's Questions [264 words]LDCJun 20, 2007 17:15
To LDC [237 words]TammyJun 22, 2007 04:08
To Pat. [317 words]TammyJun 22, 2007 04:33
To M. Tovey [262 words]TammyJun 22, 2007 04:42
Sick of war but have no other choice than to fight and hopefufly to finish the job this time [163 words]Seamus MacNemiJul 2, 2007 21:57
To Seamus MacNemi [135 words]TammyJul 22, 2007 12:26
⇒ Fatah and Hamas: Flip Sides of Same Arab Imperialism and Genocidalism [585 words]G. MarcusJun 19, 2007 23:27
Gardens in the desert - I think not [226 words]David W. LincolnJun 19, 2007 23:06
ONLY SOLUTION: GAZA TO EGYPT; WEST BANK PARTITIONED WITH JORDAN [232 words]MGJun 19, 2007 21:40
Idiots in The US Executive Branch [58 words]Ralph C Whaley MDJun 19, 2007 20:03
Yes and No [290 words]john w mcginleyJun 19, 2007 18:12
two palestines? [120 words]ralph shapiroJun 19, 2007 17:18
Shades Of Noam Chomsky [112 words]Seamus MacNemiJul 2, 2007 22:30
Abbas/Hamas=peace/schmeece [134 words]Michele Solomon FrynckoJun 19, 2007 16:11
Tactics, anyone? [138 words]Jascha KesslerJun 19, 2007 16:10
Cutting off water and electricity = bad idea [124 words]Chris G.Jun 21, 2007 14:17
A LIBERAL RESPONDS!!!! The Danger of Generalizing Fatah and Hamas [1115 words]Chris G.Jun 19, 2007 15:54
No U turns. [77 words]MWJun 21, 2007 10:56
to Chris G, the researcher and social scientist, and oh! the liberal [117 words]ASJun 25, 2007 02:40
A LIBERAL RESPONDS TO MR. AS- Emotional responses are not logical, nor productive in problem solving. [1598 words]Chris G.Jun 26, 2007 01:38
to Chris G [650 words]ASJun 27, 2007 01:58
SIR, I have thoroughly enjoyed your presentation here. [134 words]Seamus MacNemiJul 2, 2007 23:38
The Folly of Supporting Fatah and Abbas [35 words]Martin E. WeinsteinJun 19, 2007 15:52
Two 'Palestines?' Not Likely! [545 words]M. ToveyJun 19, 2007 15:41
2 Palestines, anyone [115 words]Steven LJun 19, 2007 15:38
Why is Israel doing what it is doing? [82 words]freemanJun 19, 2007 14:30
freeman, Israel is defending themselves [108 words]InfidelJun 19, 2007 15:09
How to differentiate between a Moderate Terrorist and Militant Terrorist ?? Any suggestion / explanation Mr.Pipes ? [165 words]ThokarJun 20, 2007 09:41
Sometimes doing nothing helps [98 words]freemanJun 20, 2007 21:42
idiot savant [167 words]jan lapterJun 19, 2007 14:13
Hamas Putsch Indeed Irrelevant [276 words]Lonely in KabulJun 19, 2007 14:05
Fatah and Hamas [109 words]Donald W. BalesJun 19, 2007 14:02
Israelis: Infested with Suicidal LIberalism [277 words]James BurkeJun 20, 2007 08:07
A Blast of Fresh Air - How to Build on It? [800 words]Ron ThompsonJun 19, 2007 13:45
HAMAS gunmen [85 words]Erkhum MustafaJun 19, 2007 13:07
Agreed [216 words]davidJun 19, 2007 12:55
Terrorists in the pay of? [85 words]pigfootJun 19, 2007 12:32
Two Palestinians [211 words]Ernie LofthouseJun 19, 2007 12:26
The difference between Hamas and Fatah - in feet [173 words]Mladen AndrijasevicJun 19, 2007 14:30
Penalty [51 words]true believerJun 20, 2007 04:17
Not a bad assessment Dr, Pipes, but one thing I have to point out [153 words]Bryan JacksonJun 19, 2007 11:15
Two or Twenty Palestines [76 words]ErnieJun 19, 2007 10:49
Moderates Malaysians and Islamists Talibaan united in chanting " Destroy Britain " [387 words]PanchoJun 20, 2007 09:44
One Palestine - from the river to the sea [280 words]PatJun 19, 2007 10:42
Two Palestines Anyone [17 words]Steve GureJun 19, 2007 10:38
WHAT ABOUT 2 ISRAELI STATES? [103 words]LEOJun 19, 2007 10:23
Both deadly to Israel's cause [39 words]John MorrisJun 19, 2007 10:19
Question for all US Presidents and YOU! [44 words]W WalkerJun 19, 2007 09:32
People only understand when their close member loses his life in Islamist Terror Attack [39 words]BaioirusJun 20, 2007 09:56
two factions [196 words]true believerJun 19, 2007 09:21
Where do all those M16's come from [44 words]Steven HessJun 19, 2007 09:16
Double standards will only make US weaker ! [20 words]NickJun 20, 2007 10:00
Age [132 words]MartyrMakerJun 19, 2007 09:12
Reply to Martyr Maker [13 words]Seamus MacNemiJul 3, 2007 21:12
one Palestine [48 words]samyJun 19, 2007 07:56

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page