Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Israeli leaders, weak or strong, inevitably make bad deals with the Arabs
Reader comment on item: Israel and Syria going to war?

Submitted by Kenneth S. Besig (United States), Jun 7, 2007 at 10:00

While Ehud Olmert is indeed an unpopular, and thus weak, Israeli leader, these particular characteristics make him no more likely to make a bad deal with the Arabs. Yitzchak Rabin was both a popular and strong leader when he signed off on the Oslo Accords, undoubtedly the worst and most dangerous agreement ever signed by an Israeli leader in the short history of Israel.

When Ehud Barak, undoubtedly the worst and most incompetent Prime Minister in the history of Israel, made his offers to Yassir Arafat to divide Jerusalem, and surrender 95% of Judea and Samaria, as well as render the Gaza Strip Judenrein, he was at the nadir of his popularity, and Israel was under fire at the time as well.

However, when that same Ehud Barak actually made a midnight pullout of Israeli troops from Southern Lebanon, he was at the height of his popularity, and was lauded for his "courageous" move, even though every expert now knows and publicly states that this pullout led directly to the four years of bloody fighting known as the Second Intifida.

Ariel Sharon was enjoying both personal popularity and voter confidence when he put together his now well known and scorned Disengagement Plan, the plan which actually did make the Gaza Strip Judenrein, as well as a large portion of Northern Shomron, as well as later opening Southern Israel to rocket and mortar fire from the evacuated areas of Gaza.

Thus the question is why do so many Israeli leaders make so many bad, and even dangerous deals and agreements with the Arabs? Simply stated, the problem for Israel is that too many of our political leaders take their cues and their financial support from our financial and cultural elites, elites which entirely identify with their Left wing, Socialist, European counterparts in their pro Palestinian and anti Israel attitudes.

Thus even when serious military and security experts explain the very real and immediate dangers that these bad deals pose for Israeli citizens, their comments are either ignored or denigrated, while Left wing news analysts, who may know less than nothing about anything, are given bully pulpits to convince the public to at least give these plans a chance. Of course, the ruling parties in the government will go along with any plan, no matter how ludicrous, if it means they can sit in power just a little longer.

My fear is that the day will come when one of our leaders will make a deal so bad and so dangerous that we will not be able to overcome it.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (35) on this item

Title By Date
THE BACKSTABBING MIDDLE EAST ! [363 words]jack backermanSep 8, 2007 06:39
Zakir naik [51 words]Dirk PittmanSep 8, 2007 01:47
7 DEADLY SINS OF GEORGE W BUSH: [585 words]Ernesto RibeiroJul 14, 2007 13:44
You are right about clinton! [297 words]jackSep 22, 2007 21:16
Syria announced a July 15th deadline for Syrians to leave Lebanon... [761 words]James VesceJul 12, 2007 14:58
the root of war against terrorism is rich iranians in usa and other countries accross the globe! [346 words]zari namdarJul 6, 2007 10:18
To... Zari Namdar [1699 words]Aria M.Jul 10, 2008 13:47
To Arya M,From: An XXX Iranian {now 100%American} [340 words]zari namdarJul 11, 2008 02:32
To Zahra Namdar, a.k.a Iranian Hater [1669 words]Aria M.Jul 13, 2008 18:05
heheheh [31 words]kivancJan 19, 2009 08:33
End Times War? [52 words]Clifford IshiiJun 20, 2007 17:44
Not only exciting... [2 words]JoshuaJun 21, 2007 22:17
Response to 'Endtime war?': [35 words]Matthew 24Jul 21, 2007 08:48
War with Israel, suicide for Damascus [545 words]Chris G.Jun 19, 2007 21:16
Re: A bad Idea for everyone [225 words]JoshuaJun 20, 2007 17:09
Iran's involvement with Syria [808 words]Chris G.Jun 22, 2007 11:27
No war on the Golan Border [201 words]yuval Brandstetter MDJun 11, 2007 06:09
Ahmadinejad [81 words]JoshuaJun 10, 2007 21:45
Next Year in Jerusalem? [141 words]Rebecca MouldsJun 8, 2007 20:32
Israel The Only Real Superpower In Middle East, Iran, Syria, Wanabees [124 words]AnneMJun 23, 2007 08:38
Bashar-al-Assad [83 words]Len MarkowitzJun 7, 2007 19:54
Is Assad that stupid? [55 words]Oscar NavarroJun 7, 2007 19:20
The passage of time [119 words]David W. LincolnJun 7, 2007 19:17
The problem with war [65 words]freemanJun 7, 2007 17:53
Dr. Pipes is Right unfortunately.- Deterrence in action. [278 words]YnnatchkahJun 7, 2007 17:20
hezbollah a factor [63 words]LEON ZEITZERJun 7, 2007 15:15
Incompetence has a way of generating unpredictability [59 words]RandyJun 7, 2007 13:43
Negotiating strategy? [32 words]Bobbie WenickJun 7, 2007 12:11
Israel and Syria diplomacy [224 words]jJun 7, 2007 10:14
Diplomacy and Mid-East don't mix. [177 words]Oscar NavarroJun 7, 2007 19:43
Diplomacy is only as good as the Diplomats [762 words]Chris G.Jun 30, 2007 23:44
⇒ Israeli leaders, weak or strong, inevitably make bad deals with the Arabs [428 words]Kenneth S. BesigJun 7, 2007 10:00
Frogs Luxuriating in a Large Pot of Warm Water, Over a High Flame. [619 words]marianaJun 9, 2007 11:51
War necessary for peace? [655 words]Chris G.Jun 26, 2007 18:50
For Money, The Koran does not comdemn to have business with Jews. Palestinian's Scandal. [400 words]Ynna (tchakh)May 19, 2007 17:01

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page