69 million page views

USS Liberty, the rest of the story

Reader comment on item: The Soviets' Six-Day War
in response to reader comment: USS Liberty?

Submitted by Mike DeCastro (United States), May 30, 2007 at 17:16

Oh, brother. Now this is getting comical. More myths and absurd stories about the attack on the USS Liberty. Well, how about one more?

Since someone brought it up and you mentioned there is a chapter in the book about it, I thought you would be interested in this from the military history perspective. For what it's worth, I had an interesting conversation with a former NSA guy about the actual reason the USS Liberty was so savagely attacked by Israel in 1967 and why the Commander-in-chief recalled the US Navy strike fighters and submarine that were sent to defend the Liberty.

Apparently, a US sub photographed and videotaped the entire attack and was ready to torpedo the Israeli gunboats. The sub could not take out the aerial assaulters, of course. That was going to be the job of the carrier launched strike fighters. Anyway, LBJ called them all back and the Liberty was ordered to steam out of the area at best speed after she was brutally shot to hell. The torpedoes killed the three NSA guys on-board, for example. The White House and State decided to cut its losses with the Liberty crew rather than engage the IDF.

This is not all that unusual. Liberty, BTW, was operating very close to Sinai's northern shores and that's one reason why the IDF thought for sure they had intercepts of the embarrassing transmissions. There are other material facts that expose Israel's cover-up, some have been well documented. Others not so. Like the fact that US satellite intel sent to Israel showed that Egypt's spy ship was in dry dock during the war. This would have embarrassed the Israeli excuse that they mistook Liberty for an Egyptian vessel. I guess the American flag and the American radio hails and mayday calls were not evidence enough. I think the fact that the US ambassador called the Israeli Prime Minister Levi Eshkol's office about the attack while it was still going on with detailed coordinates of its location to receive denials from the IDF while the attack continued for another hour, has been already reported.

Anyway, the reason Liberty was attacked is that IDF thought her crew had sigint intercepts of IDF radio chatter that indicated the IDF was executing Egyptian prisoners. Which the IDF was doing, in fact. The war was moving too fast to bother with handling POWs at that particular phase. This action was repeated again during the most brutal and desperate days of the Yom Kippur War in 1973. IDF units were summarily executing every Egyptian and Syrian they encountered. You must understand that Israel was very nearly annihilated both in '67 and '73. It was SOP to execute POWs until we had the upper hand and then to hold them for the eventual prisoner exchanges. War is a brutal and ugly affair and when your back is against the sea, you do what you must to survive and defeat an enemy that out-guns you by an order of magnitude.

During the YK War, for example, only the Soviet Spetznaz Strela teams were spared, for obvious reasons. We needed fast intel to devise countermeasures against those SA-7s. They were killing too many fighter-bombers. Anyway, this was not such a closely guarded secret during that war as the national consensus, as I'm sure you recall, was "payback is harsh!"

Anyway, turns out that the Liberty did not have the sigint that the IDF thought it had. They simply missed the intercepts regarding the POW executions. But, the Soviets did have it and had passed that along to the Egyptians. So, the Liberty attack was a totally unnecessary action to cover up sigint that did not actually exist, at least not on the USS Liberty.

Truth? Or, dare? The source is credible based on other things we discussed. It would account for why the NSA and USN are still so POed at Israel and why Jonathan Pollard will continue to rot in a US prison. It will take a lot of contrition and mea culpas from Israel to wipe away that bloodstain. War's harsh.

Another interesting bit of historical trivia. I had heard stories that Liberty was hit because it intercepted sigint and then transmitted it to Ft. Mead using methods and codes that the Soviets could read, therefore opening a back door to the Egyptians about IDF activity. This also was denied with creditability. Liberty was processing intel on-board and then transmitted to Ft. Mead using unbreakable microwave or microburst flash transmissions. The first bounces narrow-beam microwaves off the moon and then back to receivers at Ft. Mead. Virtually impossible to intercept. The second method was and has never been broken by the Soviets/Russians or anyone else. Another myth bites the dust.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (57) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Abdallah Schleifer fake propaganda and revealing some admitted facts [592 words]NirDec 29, 2022 22:53290405
Religious conversion: A lesson for the Jews and Hindus [215 words]PrashantDec 30, 2022 19:29290405
A fascinating theory [83 words]Ephraim MargolinSep 6, 2007 14:47107949
mig25 was operative in airforce in 1972 [50 words]Tuvia Lerner (Chief editor of http://7kanal.com)Jun 21, 2007 19:20100089
1The Soviets Six Day War - USS Liberty [99 words]DavodJun 3, 2007 08:5795874
Let's Not Overblame the Soviets [483 words]Ron ThompsonJun 2, 2007 14:3795798
Interesting explanation - but the booty Israel won was mismanaged (This issue is more relevant) [158 words]James BurkeJun 2, 2007 09:5295771
Enemies within [44 words]Carl HoffmanJun 1, 2007 04:0595615
Error: Mig-25 Not Operational Until 1970 [38 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
NathanMay 31, 2007 06:1395524
Roger that [12 words]Mike DeCastroMay 31, 2007 16:4995524
Wrong Jet [66 words]Stan DaddsMay 31, 2007 05:0495521
Planes in 1967 [56 words]Jan PollerJan 22, 2008 18:0495521
"The Soviets' Six-Day War" theory and the Soviet archives [43 words]IanusMay 30, 2007 19:1495495
Questions about "Foxbats Over Dimona." [481 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Dr. Steve CarolMay 30, 2007 17:5395484
Historical fiction AKA BS [1398 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Michael DeCastroMay 30, 2007 16:2295357
SR-71A/YF-12A "Blackbird" speeds & years in service [123 words]Dan SchwartzJun 5, 2007 08:3495357
Blackbird flights [145 words]Mike DeCastroJun 5, 2007 20:4095357
Drone is at Wright-Patterson, too [112 words]Dan SchwartzJun 6, 2007 16:3795357
what you wrote ... [41 words]does not matherMar 14, 2014 08:1695357
Soviet hand?? [53 words]VijayMay 30, 2007 12:0195331
1Islamisation of Russia and Dangers for West : Act and Ally with Russia to destroy Islamism. [1384 words]NikitaMay 30, 2007 04:0195309
Russians don't have Bread, How they'll fight war? [134 words]Un DrainMay 30, 2007 18:4795309
What are Russia's leaders doing? [214 words]PatMay 30, 2007 19:3195309
Their is a lot of funding flowed from the Middle East for Russian Islamization [57 words]Egyptian ChristianMay 30, 2007 19:5995309
to Nikita [21 words]ASMay 31, 2007 07:0295309
Russia, Islam and Israel [88 words]QuaoarJun 1, 2007 03:3995309
Negative image of Muslims in Russia and other parts of the world. [153 words]Jaisingh ThakurJul 12, 2007 01:3095309
We need to take over the oil-fields of the middle east from these barbarians [70 words]Raju (India)Jun 14, 2009 23:0395309
Egypt & Syria went to the war willingly, up to most Arabs and Muslims the War is not over yet [394 words]Egyptian ChristianMay 30, 2007 02:1195303
It's now a 40-year war [382 words]PatMay 29, 2007 22:1695186
Tiran [23 words]DOV KORETMay 29, 2007 21:0595181
The ties deepen [84 words]David W. LincolnMay 29, 2007 20:1495176
Egypt Was A Willing Participant [191 words]Andrew StunichMay 29, 2007 17:4595162
Not buying it [92 words]bernardZMay 29, 2007 23:5595162
Former Soviet Ambitions - Then and Now [346 words]M. ToveyMay 29, 2007 16:0795154
Very interesting but I do not believe it! [275 words]dhimmi no moreMay 29, 2007 15:4795151
to dhimmi no more [77 words]FOXMay 30, 2007 12:4195151
I also don't believe it. [136 words]VijayMay 30, 2007 18:0395151
Thank you very much [31 words]dhimmi no moreMay 30, 2007 19:4495151
USS Liberty? [40 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Patrick HuppMay 29, 2007 15:1595148
USS Liberty, the rest of the story [792 words]Mike DeCastroMay 30, 2007 17:1695148
Very Informative [185 words]Oscar NavarroJun 3, 2007 20:2395148
3POWs and what really happens during the fog of war [1053 words]Mike DeCastroJun 4, 2007 16:3695148
Very odd theory [96 words]Y.K.Jun 5, 2007 10:1095148
Not a theory [229 words]Mike DeCastroJun 5, 2007 20:4995148
Past Prologue to Future [72 words]MichaelMay 29, 2007 14:4895145
Interesting, but . . . [242 words]Edward HalperMay 29, 2007 14:2795144
Soviet Military Intelligence officer discussed the Six-Day War 20 years ago [85 words]Wayne WagnerMay 29, 2007 14:1095141
Questionable source [168 words]Oscar NavarroJun 3, 2007 20:5095141
studying islam since 9/11 to find out why they hate us [138 words]good_barMay 29, 2007 13:5595138
I agree with good_bar [208 words]HomefrontMay 29, 2007 19:3895138
They hate us because that's what they are taught!!! [116 words]JaladhiMay 30, 2007 14:0295138
Goebbels not Stalin [87 words]Oscar NavarroJun 4, 2007 18:2495138
Agree with your conlusion - Dr. Pipes [92 words]JaladhiMay 29, 2007 13:1495134
Interesting Thesis [138 words]David FineMay 29, 2007 12:5495131
Dr. Pipes, please expound . . . [18 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
PloniMay 29, 2007 11:4695125
The Reason for the Mistaken 1993 (and following) Policies [338 words]Ron ThompsonJun 2, 2007 15:1695125

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)