Mobile Edition
Regular Site
|
Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by M.D'Souza (United States), May 29, 2007 at 17:55
Are these Hijab, Niqab, Jiljab, etc. fashion accessories or are these Muslim girls making a statement of revolt against the society they live in? If so, they should remain in their own native lands, and not impose their ideologies and fashion statements in their adopted countries.
A couple of years ago, Mrs. Tony Blair as a lawyer, fought a case on behalf of a Muslim girl who wanted to wear her fashion accessory to school, and she won the case for her.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| How the Niqab will enter British Schools [43 words] | S.C.Panda | Jun 5, 2007 02:57 |
| Ungrateful new comers [77 words] | David W. Lincoln | May 28, 2007 16:08 |
| Never heard this argument about Niqab before [w/response] [228 words] | Jonh Goldstein | May 28, 2007 15:23 |
| ↔ ⇒ Muslim girls' 'Jihad Chic'. [82 words] | M.D'Souza | May 29, 2007 17:55 |
| ↔ No.. [132 words] | Joshua | Jan 14, 2009 11:19 |
| ↔ Jihad chickens. [25 words] | M.D'Souza | Jan 15, 2009 10:38 |
| ↔ Again, no. [85 words] | Joshua | Jan 16, 2009 14:50 |
| ↔ If you are concerned about you or your fellows looking [103 words] | Lynn | Jan 17, 2009 09:48 |
| ↔ What?????? [269 words] | Joshua | Jan 18, 2009 19:12 |
| ↔ Excuses, Excuses [130 words] | Lynn | Jan 20, 2009 23:17 |
