Submitted by Julian Tepper(United States), May 29, 2007 at 09:16
Dear Daniel,
How about sending this to the UCLA Vice Chancellor:
Dear Vice Chancellor Naples:
May I correctly assume from your correspondence to me that if four persons similarly situated to the "four who overstepped the program's protocol" were to engage in similar behavior, that is, a momentary disruption of a UCLA event (such as, for example, a graduation ceremony or a dinner for UCLA financial contributors), that the University would be of the view that such a disruption would not be of a type that warrants disciplinary action and that the authorities handling of the situation would solely be to relocate the disrupters to a place where they could exercise their First Amendment rights without disrupting the particular scheduled event?
I wonder if he would answer.
Sincerely,
Julian Tepper
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
Daniel Pipes replies:
I have sent Robert Naples such a letter today, May 29, 2007.