Submitted by Ayasha(United States), Apr 10, 2007 at 18:54
I cannot agree with you that militant Islam does not cause poverty or is unrelated to poverty.
Yes, Saudi Arabia is not poor, but is is mostly a Muslim Country that basically agrees with one another. As we have seen, a militant attack has had no effect on their economy.
Pakistan, on the other hand, is a poor Country struggling to make it in today's world. Every time a wealthy, educated suicide bomber blows up a business like McDonalds or Kentuckly Fried chicken or a militant shoots a good teacher in the streets because he is sponsoring a mixed gender footrace, I would think investment in Pakistan would go down. Potential investors from the West, especially, must wonder what the fate of their business would be in a Country so troubled by Militant Islam.
How can this beautiful little Country grow in the face of a violent Militant population that seems to be growing.
I think militant Islam has nothing to offer but poverty and death.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.