To Susan: Its my Kumbaya pleasure to give you the last word and the last laugh
Submitted by Plato (India), Mar 1, 2007 at 07:13
Suran, You are in inverted commas, my comments in bold.
"And you deny colonialism did not destroy everyting? "
One liners are useful when you have nothing to say. Single words are useful when you want to confound. And the question was concerning Native Indians and aborigines who lost everything and you deny that they did. Good for your European conscience. Amnesia is good for the soul sometimes.
"wrong, your ignorance knows no boundaries, and you are supposed to be here to discuss serious matters? This is your wrong assumption number 466558686154"
You expect me to be serious with replies like 'totally', and 'that's called planet earth' and some assumption number which I can't read and I had to cosult my son's math teacher who tells me it is more than 400 billion. You are the most serious person on this blog keeping count of my assumptions to the billions. Me serious? You got to be joking!
"The whole south of italy is looked down by the northern europeans and central europeans. This is a fact. We don't whine. We try to survive even without the northern europe's appreciation.
That's called getting on with your life, something you third worlders are not able to do."
Again Susan your special contempt for 3rd worlders continues to shine through. In this post 3rd worlders are incapable of getting on with life, we have some special kind of reasoning called 3rd worlder reasoning, in others we are whiners, still others we are police states, have a chip on our shoulders...this stupid Kumbaya is losing count.
"The perils of Muslim supremacism are accepted but not the solutions. "
the perils are not accepted since you constantly deny it, saying it's more important to think about the native indians' conditions"
This is the relevant part of my reply:
".....But you have attempted a laboured reply. The perils of Muslim supremacism are accepted but not the solutions. If that makes me a dhimmi, so be it. (Again another assumption No.XXX). ...."
Nice little twist there saying I constantly deny it. I can understand why you come to the conclusion that I do not accept the perils of Muslim supremacism: you avoid reading my posts except the most recent one. So you have assumption no XXX. You also have another assumption XXX that I say it is more important to talk about native Indians. If you have the time check back and show me where I have said so.
"...I found you pompous and more keen to reason like a third worlder than like someone pro-civilization."
Pompous: marked by assumed stateliness; overbearing. A 3rd worlder putting on airs and being overbearing in front of a 1st class European? Not a chance, we 3rd worlders know our place.
"You seem not aware of the progresses made to find other sources...."
Assumption No XXX
"Your third world india is still relying on oil. Bad for you, but as I told you earlier, your small microcosm called india is not the rest of the world."
India a small microcosm?? With 1 billion+ people. A civilsation that has been in continuous existence for near 3000+ years, unlike most. Gave you the ability to count my assumptions to billions and more. What you think of 3rd worlders continues to come through again.
Microcosm: human beings, humanity, society, or the like, viewed as an epitome or miniature of the world or universe. Yes the rest of the world it is not, but the rest of the world is in it.
"...Remember that it just took some made up stories about the jews to create the holocaust. Suddenly, anything can happen. Muslim turks had the ottoman empire and the next day.... nothing."
You seem to know something. Who is cooking up those made-up stories about Muslims. But what empire do they have to lose now? Or are you salivating at the thought of a holocaust?
"Anything can happen. Nobody thought it was possible to put severe restrictions on muslims, Russia is doing it. Nobody thought it was possible to undermine severely the muslim businesses and themselves. It is happening right before our eyes."
Oh what a happy thought. Muslims being encircled, restricted and being driven to despair. It seem to be the season for salivating.
"Give it time. Sooner than you think the ideas by noah about mass deportation would sound light in comparison."
Our own in-house blog Cassandra. No denying that we may regret not listening to your prophecy. But like the other Cassandra the world is not ready for you yet.
"tell me what compensation you (or your friends) paid and to whom for the whole continents of Australia, the two Americas, New Zealand and also the bits and pieces nearby"
ask them, do you see a native zealander blowing himself up in London? Do you see native indios blowing themselves up in Madrid?"
The Jews did not blow themselves up in Berlin when their brothers and sisters were being gassed. So the Jews were a happy lot in Germany? I can see one of your XXX assumptions that I think the Maoris and Native indians are being treated like the Jews in nazi Germany.
"You are not a criminal. How many criminals have you associated with. "
possibly you only. Ignorance is a crime."
A pompous criminal, no less.
"sorry for your anti-christian attitude, but truth is not monopoly of any creed. It's a simple condition of some concepts easily proven to be true. Sorry if you cannot produce them."
The above is your reply in response to what I posted (below):
"You wrote: that's because making up excuses, especially false ones, is hard. Sticking with the truth is much easier.
And I wrote: Spoken like a good cathecism teacher. I bow to you."
Anti-Christian attitude?? Or assumption No.XXX? Or just an ironic reply? I am anti this, anti that and anti the other. So why not anti-Christian?
"False, your knowledge of the rest of the world is pathetic. Italy wasn't a first world, it was a developing nation, that got together with a very backward part that's the south if italy only some decades before. Japan was a really backward country."
My knowledge is so pathetic that when I look at Italy or Japan at the end of WWII and Iraq of the time I can only see them as 1st worlders. Japan was backward at the end of WWII? Susan let me know where you read your history. My sources are all 3rd world fairy tales.
"Still wrong again. You cannot possibly admit that the seeds of civilization belongs to people not brainwased by your favourite death cult, can you?"
This one went over my Kumbaya head.
"Your ignorance knows no limit. To say that Germany came out from WW2 with just helps and no restrictions is simply stupid."
These one liners of yours are they meant to educate us or increase my or the readers' stupidity.? Since my ignorance is criminal punish me with the light of your knowledge on this. A compare and contrast study between what was done to Germany and Iraq will really enlighten me. I know you are not here to enlighten me. But it would be better if you kept silent rather throw out a one liner which carries no information or meaning.
"Iraq received millions in aid. Not counting that Germany, Italy and Japan didn't have any oil to sell."
Sure, to buy poison gas and to bankroll the war with Iran.
"Who asked the US to get into a sinking boat and that too with heavy luggage. Start throwing out the luggage you may just make it to the shore. That is the reasoning."
good sinking then. You wouldn't save yourself not even with the rescue army But possibly that's the way in india."
I need my reading comprehension teachers help here. Is that related to what I said? Or is it just one of your wacky answers?
"sorry if I am not like yourself that gets worried when one of your muslim masters farts."
As there are ladies reading this blog I refrain from commenting on that. Third world attitude?
so what? so bush forced saddam to kill shites? One sentence you say bush is the biggest idiot on the planet, next sentence you say he ordered from the mighty depth of his power to muslims to exterminate each other.
Here is our excahnge to which you have replied as above:
"You wrote:"If I remember well, under saddam it was the other way around, a certain chemical ali, gassing kurds and shites, a certain doctor death (a woman expert on poisons) was thinking about how to murder as many shites as possible. After all, why saddam launched the iran-iraq war, killing his brother shites? Because of USA?"
I replied: "Because of who else? Who gave Ali his gas. You seem to know what that poison woman was thinking about. Except you, probably everyone knows who egged Saddam to attack Iran."
Your next reply: Blame bush blame usa, that's the mantra, it's getting old plato, blame it on mars next time, you might get an applause for creativity."
Baby Bush was still a toddler when the gassing was going on. You wink at a power hungry dictator and you think he won't take the hint?
"...so bush forced saddam to kill shites? One sentence you say bush is the biggest idiot on the planet, next sentence you say he ordered from the mighty depth of his power to muslims to exterminate each other."
Where and when did I say all that. At this rate you will soon be ghost writing for me.
"So you also have the slave wish to be dominated and owned by the powerful, just like the Muslims wishing to be slaves of the powerful Allah. As I said Muslim is as Muslim does."
it takes a good deal of intelligence to understand irony and it was obvious from the beginning that you lack it a great deal. I am not slave. You probably are."
Here's the exchange:
"You said: Well, if USA is so powerful then it's correct that they own the whole world. They are simply too good to be true.
I replied: So you also have the slave wish to be dominated and owned by the powerful, just like the Muslims wishing to be slaves of the powerful Allah. As I said Muslim is as Muslim does"
Irony: the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning: the irony of her reply, "How nice!" when I said I had to work all weekend. (dictionary.com)
Indeed 'how nice'. Houdini could not have done better in wriggling out of that knot. I may lack in intelligence but had just enough of it to check the meaning of irony and note that you and I use different dictionaries.
"The one 'booringly' obvious truth is that you go ballistic when any Muslim country is mentioned along with any achievement, even when the mention is of pre-Islamic times. "
did I deny that the pyramids are examples of egyptians' splendor? I don't go ballistic, it's just uneducated people like yourself not knowing a damn about what happened in europe after WW2 and pretending to talk about it makes me... upset."
So why were you so upset when Iraq was mentioned in passing about the invention of writing. 'did I deny that the pyramids are examples of egyptians' splendor? That question is very carefully crafted. No mention of the modern Egyptians. Will you or won't you go ballistic if the present day Egyptian Muslim claimed that his forefathers had a hand in the splendour of ancient Egypt? Or were the Pyramids built by von Danniken's creatures from outer space?
"it was good for your superior way of living, it could be good nowadays too. What's wrong with that? your superior indian civilization used it and it was "destroyed" by bad british unfortunately.
So that is a good thing to save from 3rd world."
Your use of the word superior here brings out the meaning of 'irony' in my dictionary very well. We also read different history books. The British left the caste system and the civilisation strictly alone. What it did destroy was a good part of the local economy ((I won't use the word industry as it excites an adverse reaction).
Susan our jousting has now turned from one of gamesmanship to one of one-up-manship which I find is a meaningless exercise and waste of time. You have said that I am not serious in my replies and I take that seriously. It is slowly degenerating from one-liners to one word replies. In some of your replies there seems to be a disconnect with the point raised. Probably some of my comments also have a similar feel and I put it down to trying to see who can come up with the most cutting rejoinder instead of serious consideration of the issues.We have been flogging dead horses over several weeks and with nary a sign of even one of them coming alive.
We are agreed that there is the spectre of Islamic terrorism stalking the world. You want to deal with it one way and that is not my way. I enjoyed this skirmish with you. You are well informed and have a way with words that I find intriguing though not always enlightening. I have learned a lot from these exchanges. I leave the last word to you.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".
Reader comments (2097) on this item
Comment on this item
You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes