Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

5 steps to winning in Iraq
Reader comment on item: Bibliography – My Writings on Iraq Policy

Submitted by William Brown (United States), Feb 14, 2007 at 09:08

1) We don't associate with terorists, that means militant clerics like Muqtada Al-Sadr have to go.

2) We disarm the Iraqi civilian population, it's currently legal now for every Iraqi male to have an AK with three magazines.

3) We merge more American troops with ING forces. This has a two pronged effect. A) We make a superior fighting force. B) We gain larger amounts of inteligence Covertly / Overtly.

4)We get the the oil flowing and help bring back the economy.

5) Massive rebuilding of schools, waterplants, hospitals and highly broadcast our efforts, while taking Iraqi men off the street and back to work.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (6) on this item

Title By Date
⇒ 5 steps to winning in Iraq [105 words]William BrownFeb 14, 2007 09:08
How to prevent humanitarian catastrophe in Baghdad [2667 words]Alexander BogdanovJan 19, 2007 16:34
Ways to end the bloodshed? [68 words]VK NarayananDec 25, 2006 14:09
Victory or Death [83 words]William Dennis Brown JrFeb 14, 2007 09:17
A sensibile Iraq policy - ownership. [196 words]Herbert Nevyas MDDec 19, 2006 14:54
agreed [40 words]MarkDec 18, 2006 13:35

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page