15 readers online now

99,126 comments by 26,322 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Comments on Polls, Palestinians.....
Reader comment on item: Polls, Palestinians and the Path to Peace

Submitted by A fellow human being (Sweden), Mar 8, 2003 at 13:38

As human beings not all muslims are terrorists or violent but the problem lies in the teachings of Koran. According to Koranic verses first thing a muslim has to come in agreement that he/she has total belief in what Koran says, there is no room for argument or flexibility. Those muslims prefer themselves to call as moderate or whatsoever, is either deception or simply they have abondoned Islam but afraid to declare so because of constant fear for life.This brief introduction is in regard of the article: Polls, Palestinians and the Path to Peace by Daniel Pipes, New York Post, February 18, 2003.

If some one is not born among the muslims, I think it is impossible for him/her to comprehend Islamic psychology. I am mentioning this because I am unaware of where Mr. Pipes is born or grown up. What I am almost sure that Mr.Pipes is not born in Israel where Mr.Pipes was surrouded by muslims. It can be heard and seen all the time in state run TV or Radio or in the news papers, books or sermons from the mosques the massive propaganda, not simply hatred but very often open call to exterminate Jews and other infidels from this earth. My experience is from Bangladesh, and I wonder if it is more or less same in almost all Islamic countries.

It is very often heard from all Islamic countries in defence of terrorism the phrase "The root cause". They always say this in indirect support of terrorism perpetrated by the muslims. What the muslims hide is that the root cause of Islamic terrorism is in the teaching of Koran itself where the Jews and other infidels are denied the right to exist, so simple it is. You can change the Palestinian leadership of Mr. Arafat hundreds of times, but the root cause would still be there. Mr. Arafat or anybody else simply do not have the right to act otherwise. This is the root cause, and be in no doubt about this.Without changing the Koranic teachings, there is no way to change what is happening around.

Probably to start with, the initial responsibility lies on the shoulder of the UN. Only this body (UN) can open a discussion regarding this philosophy which I consider "against almost all basic elements of the universal human rights", strange however that unconciously or conciously, this is accepted by all civilized nations. Well, still the problem will not be solved unless the Islamic countries themselves revert the teachings of Koran. To start with, it is only the "House of the Sauds" can initiate this process. But I doubt that very much because that house would ever even think to initiate that process. The house of Sauds is believed to finance about 65000 madrasas only in Bangladesh to equip millions of souls with the most dangerous destructive weapons the human race has ever came across, the arms of hatred.

Well, then what to do to preserve freedom and dignity of the whole human race? I do not have the answer. Looking forward to see some deep writing about this by Mr. Pipes.

I become confused when I see millions of the so called peace lovers around the world demonstrate against the possible war against Mr. Saddam (the gas master of the post WWII period). the purpose of that is not only to bring the whole gang to justice but also to give the Iraqi peoples a chance to breath for a moment as free human beings, the virtue of which these so called peace lovers are enjoying every moment in their lives. Not to mention here of those hundreds of thousands of murdered peoples and almost a quarter of the Iraqi people are living in exile in fear of their lives from this murderous regime.

I become confused to see when the holy peples shake hands and sow their support in the name of peace with the leading members of the regime who just the other day gassed to death thousands Kurds, simply because they were Kurdish muslims. It is aprehensible the violent opposition by the tyranic rulers of the Islamic countries of changing the murderous Iraqi regime because of obvious reasons, but I am confused when this is done by the so called leaders of the free world. These so called peace lovers never explain how a violent regime and perpetrator of one of the most gruesome crime against humanity can be changed by peaceful means. These peace lovers never explain why they actively participated to destroy the Milocevcs regime. It would be a shame for the whole humanity to let these cruel perpetrator of genocide on their own fellow citizens go free at this juncture of history.

The dangerous axis has surfaced in this period of human history from the dormancy that is the axis composed of the Nazis, the Communists and the Extreme Islamists. And the free world is in extreme need to unite to fight these evils the humanity facing today. I just only murmer myself that is, The Nurengberg trial is still relevat today, not only to try Mr. Saddam and associates for the genocide on the Kurds, but also those who equipped him with the means which had only one purpose, that was to exterminate some human races from this earth.

A fellow human being

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (76) on this item

Title By Date
Path to Peace [32 words]steven seymourSep 20, 2005 21:18
Australasia anti-Jewish, anti-American [482 words]TimDec 26, 2003 15:16
Is there a web site whose goal is peace and open to all. [38 words]Victor J. Diamond DDS, MS.Aug 26, 2003 01:33
Settlements [189 words]Peter FloranceJun 9, 2003 06:14
Right On [60 words]Douglas Sprung MDApr 5, 2003 18:43
What about the converse? [67 words]Gordon HowardApr 3, 2003 15:51
Response to Debra [251 words]JlboothMar 14, 2003 00:25
Misreading the Media [263 words]JulianMar 11, 2003 23:43
They should come to peace [25 words]Bob BarkerMar 11, 2003 15:36
Validity of poll "margin of error" number [125 words]Maurice ShurmanMar 10, 2003 22:09
Arab Israel Conflict [92 words]David RonisMar 10, 2003 19:58
Palestinians get too much support [217 words]Yeung Wai LungMar 9, 2003 10:55
⇒ Comments on Polls, Palestinians..... [886 words]A fellow human beingMar 8, 2003 13:38
Peace to Come? [34 words]Steven SeymourMar 4, 2003 10:14
comment on peter florance's comment 2-18-03 [94 words]ralph cohenMar 1, 2003 22:19
Yes, but... [194 words]HalFeb 26, 2003 20:45
Palestinian Propaganda is being exported worldwide [312 words]David SteinbergFeb 26, 2003 20:24
1964 [67 words]izodFeb 25, 2003 15:10
Kudos [39 words]Dalia LauerFeb 25, 2003 05:44
Irreconcilable differences [50 words]James SofkoFeb 23, 2003 19:38
Their rhetoric is So Passe [56 words]MarkFeb 22, 2003 15:01
Jerusalem's status [56 words]Peter KauffnerFeb 21, 2003 23:19
the issue that is not raised enough. [215 words]David EckhausFeb 21, 2003 20:50
Recognition of Israel [208 words]A.AFeb 21, 2003 11:21
Destruction of Israel and Finally the West [142 words]robert s. catanFeb 21, 2003 10:09
An oasis [51 words]Colin spencerFeb 21, 2003 09:41
The Hoax That Is Palestine [329 words]Barry GreenspanFeb 21, 2003 01:43
Excellent analysis! [178 words]EileenFeb 20, 2003 20:44
the truth hurts [126 words]Rory WardFeb 20, 2003 12:16
Unabashed Support for Israel Vital to Winning War [290 words]John BorgmanFeb 20, 2003 12:11
Recognizing the inherent humanity of Palestinians [418 words]JeffFeb 20, 2003 01:37
Reply to Freidoon (2/18/03) : I disagree... [76 words]JorgeFeb 19, 2003 23:32
Agreement [45 words]MelvinFeb 19, 2003 19:11
U.S. Interests [119 words]Rick KralFeb 19, 2003 17:24
My thoughts [213 words]H. GamlienFeb 19, 2003 17:13
Agree in part [87 words]DawinderFeb 19, 2003 17:00
Peace is hopeless until Palestinian Leadership Changes [298 words]David MinkinFeb 19, 2003 05:35
open letter to the middle east [700 words]george orwellJul 28, 2006 18:16
Antisemitism: The Product of Neo-Paganism not arabs [537 words]Aslele ZaabiFeb 19, 2003 02:14
Antisemitism: The Product of Neo-Paganism? NOT! [915 words]adam.Dec 19, 2006 05:31
NOBODY COULD SAY IT BETTER [33 words]Judith AntonelliFeb 18, 2003 23:36
Middle East Peace [10 words]RobertFeb 18, 2003 23:14
Should tell more about poll design
[w/response] [107 words]
Bruce MyersFeb 18, 2003 21:41
Anti-Semitism and Racism is the root of rejectionism [87 words]FreidoonFeb 18, 2003 20:46
What prevents recognition of Israel NOW on its 1967 borders [102 words]hari iyerFeb 18, 2003 20:33
Short Path to Peace is Terribly Long [137 words]Marvin DiamondFeb 18, 2003 17:31
Palestinians & the Path to Peace [12 words]Bob RiesmanFeb 18, 2003 16:59
Can there be Jewish citizens in a "Palestinian" country? [212 words]Norman WandFeb 18, 2003 16:17
What "Palestinians?" [198 words]yonasonFeb 18, 2003 15:49
Genocide by any other name [170 words]Dane GundersonFeb 18, 2003 15:24
Peace and terrorism [355 words]Arlinda DeAngelisFeb 18, 2003 15:13
Response [221 words]Michael PFeb 18, 2003 15:12
Half the battle is to define the problem [133 words]Ivan BarnaFeb 18, 2003 14:51
Clear and cogent analysis [39 words]Les JordanFeb 18, 2003 14:31
"Moral problem of settlements?" [492 words]Dr. Ron PollandFeb 18, 2003 14:21
Palestinian Anger [59 words]RubenFeb 18, 2003 14:10
Bless you,Daniel Pipes ! [105 words]Victor TordjmanFeb 18, 2003 13:28
Why ARE Palestinians So Angry At Israel? [368 words]Ralph WinstanleyFeb 18, 2003 13:23
Generosity should be mutual. [229 words]Farzana Shahid.Feb 18, 2003 12:38
Another Possibility [141 words]William L. FischelFeb 18, 2003 12:21
response to Peter Florance: Water [57 words]Ron WeinerFeb 18, 2003 12:03
No Palistinian State [36 words]David CottunFeb 18, 2003 11:53
I have the answer [145 words]Joseph I. CeasarFeb 18, 2003 11:18
Forget the PALS [65 words]Glenn KlotzFeb 18, 2003 11:17
Is the Press missing something? [147 words]A. Orley Swartzentruber, Ph.D.Feb 18, 2003 10:52
Polls and Palestinians [81 words]Steven HessFeb 18, 2003 10:45
Polls,Palestinians &the Path to Peace [73 words]GARY DAVISFeb 18, 2003 10:43
Legal Assistant [71 words]Helen BienstockFeb 18, 2003 10:39
Free and informed peoples [30 words]Chris RamkoFeb 18, 2003 10:37
Polls Telling, PLO/Arafat's Own Words More Telling [380 words]WilliamFeb 18, 2003 10:16
epiphany [29 words]D.SokolFeb 18, 2003 09:51
I agree but...
[w/response] [68 words]
Ralph CohenFeb 18, 2003 09:46
I agree [190 words]DebraFeb 18, 2003 08:52
Sincere recognition of Israel essential [57 words]Andreas H. AureFeb 18, 2003 07:48
Settlements [194 words]Peter FloranceFeb 18, 2003 07:24
No brainer [109 words]David WulfmanFeb 18, 2003 07:21

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premium Links by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.