30 readers online now

98,675 comments by 26,222 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Antisemitism: The Product of Neo-Paganism? NOT!
Reader comment on item: Polls, Palestinians and the Path to Peace
in response to reader comment: Antisemitism: The Product of Neo-Paganism not arabs

Submitted by adam. (United States), Dec 19, 2006 at 05:31

Yes the Semitic peoples have much similarity. They have spread all over the Middle East and while doing so have fought so many Holy wars for so long that no one can remember the body count that just keeps raising. Even the Current War can be linked to one or more of the Semitic faiths. Elohim commands his people (the Hebrews) to kill en mass anyone who is not one of his. Allah dose the same. I see a trend here. The Faith of the Semitic peoples have always been about blood and nothing has changed.

Again you are right, Most people in this area are of Indo-European stock and their ancestors were Pagans or Polytheists. However you are incorrect in stating that Wotan is a symbol of Pagan Barbarism for Barbarism is not a Pagan trait no more then bigotry. Rather it seems that Racism and bigotry along with barbarism are hallmarks of Monotheism and Semitic peoples faith. Elohim says "Thou shall not suffer a witch to live" He commands King Saul to commit Mass murder and he himself is a baby killer. He murdered the babies of Egypt (another Semitic people) in cold blood. Why? Because the king of Egypt would not let the Hebrews go. Yet its funny that he should "Smite" Egypt's babies when he (Elohim) took away The kings free will and thus not allowing him to Free The Hebrews. He murdered these babies to show of his own power. Now That is Barbaric! Is Allah any better? No! He commands the Arabs via the Quran to spread the faith by the sword. Yeah, if that is your idea of Moral and peace loving then it shows the real reason for all the TNT strapped to Muslim backs and why they are killing other Semites . You text Allah is as bad as the Jewish Elohim and maybe worse because he is nothing more then a upstart god. At least Elohim as age on his side and his people a real claim to the land.


you claim that Rome was savage. Your right, they were are military based civilization bent on ruling the world. None of that had a lick to do with faith. They did not kill people because of faith, they wanted land and money. That's it. They allowed other nations to keep their Gods. All people can be violent and hateful as you prove with your little tid bit here. It is a part of who we are as a spices. We are predators by nature. Yes you and yours want to blame everything that is wrong in the world on one faith group. Why? Because Allah told you too? how typically narrow minded. You spread your faith by the sword just like the Christians and Jews did. Your faith tells you to kill anyone who is not among your faith group and to take their lands, and money. Your faith is one of hate and murder. I reject your claim that Neo-Pagans are Anti-Semitic. They are not. I happen to know many Pagans and Jews and Arabs that are the best of friends. Their faiths not withstanding. I know may good Jews and Arabs that are moderate and work for the betterment of their peoples. Its a shame that your article works so hard to undo the good that they have done. Neo-Pagans today see that their ancestors lived in a hostile world and had to fight to live. Their actions were not always moral but then again neither are the actions of your ancestors or the current Semitic peoples. Pagans of today do not pretend that their ancestors were perfect or always peaces loving. It is a hard truth that sometimes in life you have to fight to keep the ones you love safe or to keep your land safe. Yet is seems to me that you have no room to be casting stones at Pagans of any time. Your people are still highly committed to Jihad. In 4000 years the different types of Semitic monotheism has not changed at the core. it is a religion of death and Crusaders.

Neo-Paganism has not in fact incited hostility against religion or given birth to fascism. That would be Monotheism baby. Your basic lack of research and knowledge loom large in this work. The Nazi's were Christian in nature which corrupted Pagan symbols and used them for hate. Christianity is (like Islam) a daughter faith of Judaism. It, like it's mother faith went on killing anyone who was not in complete agreement with their ideals. Thus, Islam, Judaism and Christianity have been trying to kill or convert each other for about 2000 years now. It is not Neo-Pagans that hate Semitic people but the other way around. Pagans are by their very nature inclusive not exclusive as are your peoples. There is no ONE WAY. There are many. Its a shame that you still have not figured it out as a people. Do I hate Jews and Arabs or other Semitic people? No. I am very good friends with a number of them. I respect many of their ideas even if I do not agree with all of them. What I do hate are lies (such as has been spread here) against Pagans, so that People like you can pass the buck. ANTI-SEMITISM is not of Pagan origin, it is of Semitic origin. When you stop the hate, the blood in the East will stop flowing.
Adam.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (76) on this item

Title By Date
Path to Peace [32 words]steven seymourSep 20, 2005 21:18
Australasia anti-Jewish, anti-American [482 words]TimDec 26, 2003 15:16
Is there a web site whose goal is peace and open to all. [38 words]Victor J. Diamond DDS, MS.Aug 26, 2003 01:33
Settlements [189 words]Peter FloranceJun 9, 2003 06:14
Right On [60 words]Douglas Sprung MDApr 5, 2003 18:43
What about the converse? [67 words]Gordon HowardApr 3, 2003 15:51
Response to Debra [251 words]JlboothMar 14, 2003 00:25
Misreading the Media [263 words]JulianMar 11, 2003 23:43
They should come to peace [25 words]Bob BarkerMar 11, 2003 15:36
Validity of poll "margin of error" number [125 words]Maurice ShurmanMar 10, 2003 22:09
Arab Israel Conflict [92 words]David RonisMar 10, 2003 19:58
Palestinians get too much support [217 words]Yeung Wai LungMar 9, 2003 10:55
Comments on Polls, Palestinians..... [886 words]A fellow human beingMar 8, 2003 13:38
Peace to Come? [34 words]Steven SeymourMar 4, 2003 10:14
comment on peter florance's comment 2-18-03 [94 words]ralph cohenMar 1, 2003 22:19
Yes, but... [194 words]HalFeb 26, 2003 20:45
Palestinian Propaganda is being exported worldwide [312 words]David SteinbergFeb 26, 2003 20:24
1964 [67 words]izodFeb 25, 2003 15:10
Kudos [39 words]Dalia LauerFeb 25, 2003 05:44
Irreconcilable differences [50 words]James SofkoFeb 23, 2003 19:38
Their rhetoric is So Passe [56 words]MarkFeb 22, 2003 15:01
Jerusalem's status [56 words]Peter KauffnerFeb 21, 2003 23:19
the issue that is not raised enough. [215 words]David EckhausFeb 21, 2003 20:50
Recognition of Israel [208 words]A.AFeb 21, 2003 11:21
Destruction of Israel and Finally the West [142 words]robert s. catanFeb 21, 2003 10:09
An oasis [51 words]Colin spencerFeb 21, 2003 09:41
The Hoax That Is Palestine [329 words]Barry GreenspanFeb 21, 2003 01:43
Excellent analysis! [178 words]EileenFeb 20, 2003 20:44
the truth hurts [126 words]Rory WardFeb 20, 2003 12:16
Unabashed Support for Israel Vital to Winning War [290 words]John BorgmanFeb 20, 2003 12:11
Recognizing the inherent humanity of Palestinians [418 words]JeffFeb 20, 2003 01:37
Reply to Freidoon (2/18/03) : I disagree... [76 words]JorgeFeb 19, 2003 23:32
Agreement [45 words]MelvinFeb 19, 2003 19:11
U.S. Interests [119 words]Rick KralFeb 19, 2003 17:24
My thoughts [213 words]H. GamlienFeb 19, 2003 17:13
Agree in part [87 words]DawinderFeb 19, 2003 17:00
Peace is hopeless until Palestinian Leadership Changes [298 words]David MinkinFeb 19, 2003 05:35
open letter to the middle east [700 words]george orwellJul 28, 2006 18:16
Antisemitism: The Product of Neo-Paganism not arabs [537 words]Aslele ZaabiFeb 19, 2003 02:14
⇒ Antisemitism: The Product of Neo-Paganism? NOT! [915 words]adam.Dec 19, 2006 05:31
NOBODY COULD SAY IT BETTER [33 words]Judith AntonelliFeb 18, 2003 23:36
Middle East Peace [10 words]RobertFeb 18, 2003 23:14
Should tell more about poll design
[w/response] [107 words]
Bruce MyersFeb 18, 2003 21:41
Anti-Semitism and Racism is the root of rejectionism [87 words]FreidoonFeb 18, 2003 20:46
What prevents recognition of Israel NOW on its 1967 borders [102 words]hari iyerFeb 18, 2003 20:33
Short Path to Peace is Terribly Long [137 words]Marvin DiamondFeb 18, 2003 17:31
Palestinians & the Path to Peace [12 words]Bob RiesmanFeb 18, 2003 16:59
Can there be Jewish citizens in a "Palestinian" country? [212 words]Norman WandFeb 18, 2003 16:17
What "Palestinians?" [198 words]yonasonFeb 18, 2003 15:49
Genocide by any other name [170 words]Dane GundersonFeb 18, 2003 15:24
Peace and terrorism [355 words]Arlinda DeAngelisFeb 18, 2003 15:13
Response [221 words]Michael PFeb 18, 2003 15:12
Half the battle is to define the problem [133 words]Ivan BarnaFeb 18, 2003 14:51
Clear and cogent analysis [39 words]Les JordanFeb 18, 2003 14:31
"Moral problem of settlements?" [492 words]Dr. Ron PollandFeb 18, 2003 14:21
Palestinian Anger [59 words]RubenFeb 18, 2003 14:10
Bless you,Daniel Pipes ! [105 words]Victor TordjmanFeb 18, 2003 13:28
Why ARE Palestinians So Angry At Israel? [368 words]Ralph WinstanleyFeb 18, 2003 13:23
Generosity should be mutual. [229 words]Farzana Shahid.Feb 18, 2003 12:38
Another Possibility [141 words]William L. FischelFeb 18, 2003 12:21
response to Peter Florance: Water [57 words]Ron WeinerFeb 18, 2003 12:03
No Palistinian State [36 words]David CottunFeb 18, 2003 11:53
I have the answer [145 words]Joseph I. CeasarFeb 18, 2003 11:18
Forget the PALS [65 words]Glenn KlotzFeb 18, 2003 11:17
Is the Press missing something? [147 words]A. Orley Swartzentruber, Ph.D.Feb 18, 2003 10:52
Polls and Palestinians [81 words]Steven HessFeb 18, 2003 10:45
Polls,Palestinians &the Path to Peace [73 words]GARY DAVISFeb 18, 2003 10:43
Legal Assistant [71 words]Helen BienstockFeb 18, 2003 10:39
Free and informed peoples [30 words]Chris RamkoFeb 18, 2003 10:37
Polls Telling, PLO/Arafat's Own Words More Telling [380 words]WilliamFeb 18, 2003 10:16
epiphany [29 words]D.SokolFeb 18, 2003 09:51
I agree but...
[w/response] [68 words]
Ralph CohenFeb 18, 2003 09:46
I agree [190 words]DebraFeb 18, 2003 08:52
Sincere recognition of Israel essential [57 words]Andreas H. AureFeb 18, 2003 07:48
Settlements [194 words]Peter FloranceFeb 18, 2003 07:24
No brainer [109 words]David WulfmanFeb 18, 2003 07:21

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.