|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
More of the SameReader comment on item: What Went Wrong with James A. Baker, III? Submitted by Abu Sahajj (United States), Dec 13, 2006 at 01:25 What I gather from the collective consciousness of these commenters is that critique and inquiry are equal to resolve. However, in the real world critique and inquiry are just critique and inquiry, dissent and slander against Baker is not helping the situation, yet Baker and his constituent's efforts are. You may call Baker anything under the Sun, but it doesn't change the fact that he is heading a committee to try to fix Bush's mess, while you are left to argue, critique and inquire the results. Give the guy a break... -- Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||