|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
sitting... waiting....Reader comment on item: What Went Wrong with James A. Baker, III? Submitted by Donald O (United States), Dec 11, 2006 at 21:48 Baker and the study have come to a reasonable conclusion much like W Bush had after many years of no progress [in dealing with Iraq - with 18 UN Resolutions and still attacks in no fly zone etc]. It's time to try something different. Maybe they need 'land for peace' lol the realization is that you can't depend on the primitive mentality of the Arabs in this flawed construction of a country [thanks to Brit King George et al]. The Iraqi PM and others immediately called the recommendations 'dangerous' etc so obviously they expected this to become a drawn-out American brokered quagmire like the Israeli/Palestinian debacle with Bagdad Bob calling the shots too eh? Thanks for getting us in there W! to win right? well it's mission acxcomplished > now get us out! Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||