Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Welcome response
Reader comment on item: Letters to the editor: Jihad and the Professors

Submitted by Carol Thorndyke (United States), Feb 13, 2003 at 20:42

Daniel's replies to his detractors were a welcome response to the personal attacks and selective interpretations of professors seem intent on disseminating their biased views to captive audiences (such as students who are pressured to take their courses, attend lectures by guest speakers, and/or produce papers that reflect the one-sided views of the professor). Unfortunately the media is often only too happy to regurgitate these views as if they were truths that can't be questioned, refuted, or made the subject of debate. And until universities and the media develop the strength and integrity to do exactly that - to question, refute, and debate these views with facts, not only within their own ranks, but with the help of others capable of presenting different, even opposing, views supported by equally (or even more) compelling evidence - the public will continue to be subjected to the same brand of bias that Daniel is attempting to overcome.

It must seem like a hopeless task at times, although his recent "breakthrough" at York University in Toronto [albeit after outfoxing the usual bands of outraged protesters by changing the venue], was a positive sign.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title By Date
militant Islam [25 words]Lon BevillJan 23, 2004 19:30
Ignorance [79 words]Daeng TinroDec 3, 2003 02:43
Beauty (and evil) are often in the eyes of the beholder [251 words]Gary NewmanJul 30, 2003 05:29
Perhaps the problem is with weak news reporting, then [723 words]Terri WonderJul 13, 2003 19:10
Hatred vs. tolerance [154 words]pdc5210`May 19, 2003 05:34
⇒ Welcome response [189 words]Carol ThorndykeFeb 13, 2003 20:42
Israel [95 words]Gary LoftusFeb 13, 2003 14:05
Jihad is warfare [116 words]ChuckFeb 12, 2003 00:02
Way truth and life modified? [155 words]A. J. NolteFeb 7, 2003 17:19
Keep up the good fight! [117 words]Michael ClarkFeb 7, 2003 14:06
Islamic revisionist theories [164 words]hari iyerFeb 7, 2003 10:56
Disinformation yet again from the defenders of Islam [119 words]J.ShearerFeb 7, 2003 08:58
Jihad is not Always a Peaceful Exercise [274 words]S.F.Gohara, M.D.Feb 7, 2003 07:44
the most important lesson of all... [78 words]Tammy Erann-SoussanFeb 7, 2003 04:13
Jihad on September 11 [109 words]Arlinda DeAngelisFeb 7, 2003 00:41
What does this tell us about the press? [103 words]Irvin J. FarberFeb 6, 2003 21:26
Thank you and keep up the good work [44 words]Oleg ChernyakFeb 6, 2003 18:08
How Soviet agitprop methods are used by Islamic extremists [272 words]Ken BesigFeb 6, 2003 14:52
Kudos [5 words]Bob SternFeb 6, 2003 13:27
The fairness of Dan Pipes [92 words]Dave JaycoxFeb 6, 2003 10:50
Jihad and conscience [246 words]Jiri SeveraFeb 6, 2003 10:32
You're a good man, Charlie Brown [226 words]Rick MoorefieldFeb 6, 2003 10:04
The Hajj [67 words]Yosef SternFeb 6, 2003 10:02
Looks like profs running for cover. [78 words]dennisw-usaFeb 6, 2003 08:45
Scholarship [45 words]Dixon PorterFeb 6, 2003 08:00
Re: Jihad and the professors [21 words]Stuart DewFeb 6, 2003 07:52

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page