Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Jihad is warfare
Reader comment on item: Letters to the editor: Jihad and the Professors

Submitted by Chuck (United States), Feb 12, 2003 at 00:02

Daniel Pipes is right on in saying Jihad is warfare. He isn't the only one to "drop the dime" on Islam. In all four schools of Islam, there is Jihad, war against non-believers. That's you and me to all you non-Muslims. In Islam the world is divided simply between two poles, war and peace. The world of peace, of course, is Islam. The world of war is all those non-Muslim areas of the globe yet to be conquered.

Please read:

Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions About the World's Fastest Growing Faith, by Robert Spencer.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1893554589/ref=pd_sim_books_4/002-6100850-3546404?v=glance&s=books

Islam and Dhimmitude: Where Civilizations Collide, by Bat Yeor.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0838639437/qid=1045025762/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-6100850-3546404?v=glance&s=books

Ivory Towers on Sand: The Failure of Middle Eastern Studies in America, by Martin Kramer.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0944029493/qid=1045025626/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/002-6100850-3546404?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title By Date
militant Islam [25 words]Lon BevillJan 23, 2004 19:30
Ignorance [79 words]Daeng TinroDec 3, 2003 02:43
Beauty (and evil) are often in the eyes of the beholder [251 words]Gary NewmanJul 30, 2003 05:29
Perhaps the problem is with weak news reporting, then [723 words]Terri WonderJul 13, 2003 19:10
Hatred vs. tolerance [154 words]pdc5210`May 19, 2003 05:34
Welcome response [189 words]Carol ThorndykeFeb 13, 2003 20:42
Israel [95 words]Gary LoftusFeb 13, 2003 14:05
⇒ Jihad is warfare [116 words]ChuckFeb 12, 2003 00:02
Way truth and life modified? [155 words]A. J. NolteFeb 7, 2003 17:19
Keep up the good fight! [117 words]Michael ClarkFeb 7, 2003 14:06
Islamic revisionist theories [164 words]hari iyerFeb 7, 2003 10:56
Disinformation yet again from the defenders of Islam [119 words]J.ShearerFeb 7, 2003 08:58
Jihad is not Always a Peaceful Exercise [274 words]S.F.Gohara, M.D.Feb 7, 2003 07:44
the most important lesson of all... [78 words]Tammy Erann-SoussanFeb 7, 2003 04:13
Jihad on September 11 [109 words]Arlinda DeAngelisFeb 7, 2003 00:41
What does this tell us about the press? [103 words]Irvin J. FarberFeb 6, 2003 21:26
Thank you and keep up the good work [44 words]Oleg ChernyakFeb 6, 2003 18:08
How Soviet agitprop methods are used by Islamic extremists [272 words]Ken BesigFeb 6, 2003 14:52
Kudos [5 words]Bob SternFeb 6, 2003 13:27
The fairness of Dan Pipes [92 words]Dave JaycoxFeb 6, 2003 10:50
Jihad and conscience [246 words]Jiri SeveraFeb 6, 2003 10:32
You're a good man, Charlie Brown [226 words]Rick MoorefieldFeb 6, 2003 10:04
The Hajj [67 words]Yosef SternFeb 6, 2003 10:02
Looks like profs running for cover. [78 words]dennisw-usaFeb 6, 2003 08:45
Scholarship [45 words]Dixon PorterFeb 6, 2003 08:00
Re: Jihad and the professors [21 words]Stuart DewFeb 6, 2003 07:52

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page