15 readers online now

99,126 comments by 26,322 readers

Go to Mobile Site

A world gone crazy!
Reader comment on item: Some News Items from Londonistan
in response to reader comment: Double standards continue apace

Submitted by Nick (Japan), Sep 30, 2006 at 19:25

Yes, GF, I totally agree! Where indeed are the animal rights activists when you need 'em?

Which begs the question, where are the police when you need 'em?

Lest we forget, Daniel Pipes warned us in his weblog shown below (dated August 1, 2005):

"Cops Made to Raid in Socks": The punchy headline comes from today's London's Sun, but the full details are provided in yesterday's Bedfordshire on Sunday, telling of an 18-point guide with dos and don'ts when dealing with Muslims suspected of terrorist or drugs offences. The guidelines, reissued last week by the Bedfordshire Police, starts by noting that because Muslims feel "victimised and suspicious of counter terrorist police operations," the search of a British Muslim household "has the potential to become a critical incident and come under intense scrutiny." Therefore, the police have to be especially cautious.

  • Officers should not take shoes into the houses, especially in areas that might be kept pure for prayer purposes.
  • Non-Muslims are not allowed to touch holy books, Qurans or religious artifacts without permission. Where possible, Muslim officers in a state of "Wudhu" [ritual purity] should be used for this purpose.
  • Police should seek to avoid looking at unclad Muslim women and allow them to dress and cover their heads.
  • If people are praying at home officers should stand aside and not disrupt the prayer. They should be allowed the opportunity to finish.
  • For reasons of dignity officers should seek to avoid entering occupied bedrooms and bathrooms.
  • Use of police dogs will be considered serious desecration of the premises and may necessitate extensive cleaning of the house and disposal of household items.
  • Advice should be sought before considering the use of cameras and camcorders due to the risk of capturing individuals, especially women, in inappropriate dress.
  • Muslim prisoners should be allowed to take additional clothing to the station.
  • In the current climate the justification for pre-dawn raids on Muslim houses needs to be clear and transparent.
  • Rapid entry needs to be the last resort and raids into Muslim houses are discouraged for religious dignity reasons.

At least we know where the UK cops are; they're pussyfooting around instead of being allowed to carry out their normal duties. Given those circumstances, is it surprising that crime in the UK, percentage-wise, has overtaken that in the US (excluding murder and rape)?

The above seems almost impossible to believe, but it serves to alert us to the extreme situation with regard to Muslims in both the UK and the US. Their sensitivity seems to know no bounds. How touchy can one really get? And they're getting away with it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Meanwhile, more and more refugees are coming in, who immediately go on welfare, placing an even heavier burden on social welfare. Unbelievably, the four London bombers, born in the UK, were all on welfare.

The US, too, must share the blame, mollycoddling their prisoners at Guantanamo, making sure they're provided with Korans so they can recite at will their twisted messages. Do the guards tuck them in at night?

Remember 9/11, anyone? Most if not all of the hijackers were Saudi Arabians, yet the Bush administration has a too-cozy relationship with the Saudi royal family. The Saudis, said to be America's "ally" in the ME, has proved time and time again by their actions that they, too, are our enemies.

The list of Saudi Arabia's do's and don't's for anyone wishing to work in that country beggars belief, yet Saudi Arabians who come to the UK and US are accorded a warm welcome with open arms, enabling them to enjoy every single freedom in those countries, and they're still not satisfied.

Can you imagine banks in the UK which displayed piggy banks in their logos to suggest financial prudency have caved in to the sensitivities of Muslims! Now, they want special swimming pools for Islamic women, special sections in restaurants for their women, special this, special that, and the authorities are falling over themselves trying their utmost to accommodate these ingrates in every possible manner. The more you give in, the more they demand. To Muslims (Arabs), giving in shows weakness, which they are quick to exploit.

Now, they've even won the battle over the way we are to be laid to rest; we are to be buried facing Mecca rather than our traditional position facing east. The list is endless, and so petty, and without one attempt to accommodate the feelings of Westerners in their own lands. Where is all this going to lead?

Folks, it's going to get worse before it gets better! Islamic customs are invading every possible aspect of our lives in the West, and more and more of these scum are coming in to strengthen their position. Over 1,200 mosques and 1.6 million Muslims in the UK; over 2,000 mosques in the US; more than half-a-million Muslims in Chicago alone.

Over 40% of Muslims living in the UK want Sharia Law, no doubt led by Muslim males to allow them to continue their chauvinistic treatment of women. Heaven forbid!

The British and the Americans are long-suffering, but eventually a halt will have to be called to the madness of permitting the immigration of this filth. Unfortunately, I foresee ethnic cleansing as the only alternative to this cancer, which has been allowed to spread unheeded and so quickly.

Our leaders need to take their blinders off!


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (61) on this item

Title By Date
Appeasement is equal to dhimmitude [224 words]Phil GreendJun 29, 2007 14:29
A question for Doctor Pipes
[w/response] [18 words]
Octavio JohansonOct 21, 2006 10:41
British people don't believe in God [194 words]Octavio JohansonOct 20, 2006 04:57
Religion a thorn in one's side! [634 words]Nick4693Dec 3, 2007 19:35
I love Muslims [134 words]VijayOct 15, 2006 05:22
Italystan [68 words]Octavio JohansonOct 19, 2006 11:04
Allah comes to London [340 words]ChristinaOct 25, 2006 21:00
Better safe than sorry [210 words]Octavio JohansonOct 15, 2006 05:22
cemetery [118 words]jack hawkinsOct 8, 2006 07:04
Let Londonistan be Londonistan [59 words]Octavio JohansonOct 6, 2006 12:06
Muslim police officer dodges his duty [18 words]VijayOct 5, 2006 09:26
Sack the Muslim police officer [14 words]Octavio JohansonOct 11, 2006 17:50
My own, private Londonistan [94 words]Octavio JohansonOct 5, 2006 05:31
bombs [59 words]michael cOct 8, 2006 07:33
Here they go, again [149 words]Octavio JohansonOct 9, 2006 11:24
to Michael [9 words]VijayOct 11, 2006 06:32
Pendle 'Bomb-Factory' Story [199 words]John, UKOct 25, 2006 09:52
'Bomb-Factory' story links [29 words]John, UKOct 25, 2006 16:50
Some News Items From Londonistan [69 words]S.C.PandaOct 4, 2006 06:13
no parallels....yet... [237 words]J.S.Oct 2, 2006 17:05
More from London [112 words]alanOct 2, 2006 10:21
Life in the UK " Ummah Al-Koran" [370 words]Jeff BurkeOct 23, 2006 09:20
England- Phooey! [103 words]BobbertOct 2, 2006 06:51
New England > Al-Inglaterra [71 words]Jeff BurkeOct 4, 2006 12:58
Quebecistan? [12 words]Octavio JohansonOct 15, 2006 13:55
Ripe for a Londonistan in Canada [441 words]Jeff BurkeOct 17, 2006 07:55
Londonistan, all over the world [49 words]Octavio JohansonOct 17, 2006 19:04
Canada... [325 words]J.S.Oct 18, 2006 23:17
Re: Canada [60 words]Octavio JohansonOct 20, 2006 12:12
Millions in your country?? [411 words]J.S.Oct 20, 2006 17:17
My country [4 words]Octavio JohansonOct 24, 2006 17:42
I see... [205 words]J.S.Oct 25, 2006 21:30
Beware the Ides of NAU [382 words]ChristinaOct 28, 2006 14:08
Did you happen to catch Glenn Beck last night? [136 words]J.S.Oct 31, 2006 11:34
J.S. [182 words]Octavio JohansonNov 5, 2006 17:05
Immigration, Glenn Beck, etc. [628 words]J.S.Nov 7, 2006 20:30
Jeff Beck Radio Talk show station on internet is.... [9 words]Jeff BurkeNov 8, 2006 17:19
Why The World Is Blind [554 words]Bubba's PravdaOct 1, 2006 01:01
Another Islamic custom in place! [205 words]NickSep 29, 2006 20:33
Double standards continue apace [22 words]G. FraserSep 30, 2006 06:23
⇒ A world gone crazy! [895 words]NickSep 30, 2006 19:25
Double Standard? [103 words]JacquelineSep 30, 2006 20:26
Facing Mecca
[w/response] [157 words]
raheel khokharSep 29, 2006 17:00
Right-wing commentators [99 words]Octavio JohansonOct 10, 2006 10:46
Living in Londonistan [261 words]raheelOct 11, 2006 15:34
To Raheel [206 words]Octavio JohansonOct 12, 2006 02:54
My subjective view-point [144 words]Octavio JohansonOct 12, 2006 08:10
The failure of multiculturism [137 words]raheelOct 12, 2006 16:57
I will try to be fair to the British [159 words]Octavio JohansonOct 13, 2006 02:30
Origins of PC?? [56 words]Kevin MOct 13, 2006 10:59
the boy in the bubble [336 words]raheelOct 13, 2006 16:23
affirmative action! [132 words]raheel khokharOct 14, 2006 17:08
Raheel [199 words]Octavio JohansonOct 14, 2006 18:49
About political correctness... [370 words]J.S.Oct 19, 2006 15:35
PC in Canadastan [83 words]JaladhiOct 19, 2006 16:53
The term of choice for the CBC is... [147 words]J.S.Oct 19, 2006 18:29
CBC, CFRA, CJAD, CHOM, GLOBE & MAIL, MONTREAL GAZETTE, CTV,,, [232 words]Jeff BurkeOct 21, 2006 08:58
TO Octavio, Dr Pipes, JS, Jaladhi: Canadian Radio Commentators fawning Islam: Michael Harris of CFRA [163 words]Jeff BurkeOct 21, 2006 09:09
The boy OUT of the bubble [55 words]OctavioDec 6, 2006 16:09
It has come to this [28 words]OctavioDec 16, 2006 17:29
running scared [225 words]raheelDec 18, 2006 16:19

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premium Links by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.