Pro-jihadi disinformation from Tez Dhar, and here's the straight facts

Submitted by Rakshas 10 Anan (India), Sep 4, 2006 at 11:52

Tez Dhar would have us believe that Hindu pilgrims are antisocial and high on narcotics, and that justifies arsoning them to death in jihadi islamofascist savagery! And what business do Hindus have in India, shouting Hindu slogans while returning from a pilgrimage? The chief perpetrator has found safe haven in jihadistan, like all other brute killers causing deaths of innocents in India!

In the meanwhile, many stories were invented about the train passengers heckling at bystanders on the railway platforms, or even 'abducting burqa-clad women', in a pathetic attempt to justify the heinous act by the jihadi agent provocateurs. The retaliation in Gujarat cannot be justified, although it was an example of widespread people's ire, when pushed to the wall, after decades of appeasement to the jihadi force in their midst! Interesting how united Gujarat was in that moment, at the people's level, when no party apparatus -- not even the long-standing Nehru-Gandhi Congress Party of Muslim Appeasement -- came forth in defence of the jihadis!!!

These facts are enough! http://www.vskgujarat.com/godhraandaftermath/godhracarnage.htm

Sabarmati Express set ablaze, 57 dead, http://www.tribuneindia.com/2002/20020228/main1.htm

They lived through death to tell tale: In 45 minutes of horror on Sabarmati Express, 57 died but many escaped and..., http://www.indianexpress.com/res/web/pIe/ie20020228/ayo1.html

And despite much Hindu-baiting on this left-leaning rag, under the misnamed, Hindu-hating publishing house, some facts to face: Godhra Questions, http://www.flonnet.com/fl1906/19060120.htm

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".