Submitted by Marc Mayerson(United States), Aug 17, 2006 at 16:54
The current discussion about what to call the terrorists is sadly indicative about the war against them: no one can make up their mind about the correct choice. That it has devolved into a semantic and etymological discussion is even more absurd.
We called the Nazi's "Nazi's" because it was an acronym for what their multi-word title. We called the Fascists "Fascists" because their movement was called "fascista." The bottom line: we should call the terrrorists what they call themselves: jihadists. We are at war against Islamic jihadism.
The Muslims make no bones about who they are at war with: Zionists.
We should make no bones about who we are at war with: Jihadists.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.