Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

The US Gov't Hurts the Cause by Not Naming the Enemy
Reader comment on item: State's Terror Untruths

Submitted by Frank Luke (United States), May 30, 2002 at 19:36

An excellent article, highlighting the serious error that Washington is making. The events of September 11 took place primarily because of Washington's unwillingness to call a spade a spade.

The Clinton government was more keen on garnering votes from Muslims than they were in protecting US interests. One thing that can be said in favor of fanatic Islamists is that they know who their enemies are. Those who run Washington either do not know, or are reluctant to speak up.

We can only hope that though Washington has not named militant Islam as the enemy of the civilized world, they are nevertheless treating it as such, and taking steps appropriate to stop it.

Had Washington been as proactive in preventing terrorism, as Bin Laden was in perpetrating it, September 11 would never had happened.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (33) on this item

Title By Date
I agree wholeheartedly [51 words]Parmia DeeJul 9, 2004 02:58
I couldn't agree with you more! [57 words]Robert O'BrienSep 9, 2002 16:15
The UN Security Council headed by Terror Supporter [171 words]Judi R. CohenJun 6, 2002 18:18
Response to comments posted by Susie (May 30-"Excerpts...") [551 words]Sam LahiriJun 4, 2002 13:51
Assistant Secretary Burns is no friend of Israel's [89 words]Michael RifkinMay 30, 2002 20:19
⇒ The US Gov't Hurts the Cause by Not Naming the Enemy [131 words]Frank LukeMay 30, 2002 19:36
Excerpt of my letter to Bush, Cheney and State Dep't [480 words]SusieMay 30, 2002 15:49
What You Don't Know Can Hurt You [470 words]M. W. GuzyMay 29, 2002 22:46
Why does the State Dep't ignore Islam's toxic hatred of the West? [560 words]David GilchristMay 29, 2002 22:25
Peace on Earth [533 words]JamesFeb 12, 2006 12:17
Congressional Investigation of State Dept. [98 words]R. LevineMay 29, 2002 20:02
Apathy All Around [110 words]E. E. MichaelMay 29, 2002 18:52
HOOAH! [36 words]Howard SimkinMay 29, 2002 16:43
Source please [73 words]Mike LiverightMay 29, 2002 16:35
Comment on "Insight On Public Apathy" Remarks [360 words]Matthew ReidMay 29, 2002 15:00
Insight on Public Apathy [219 words]William J. SturmMay 29, 2002 05:18
"Palestinian nationalism" [183 words]Gilbert SimonsMay 29, 2002 00:36
Intentional Deception! [236 words]William J. SturmMay 28, 2002 23:51
Telling Lies [42 words]Alice Smyth-HopkinsMay 28, 2002 23:31
Thank God for Daniel Pipes [52 words]Goldie SacksnerMay 28, 2002 22:52
Your Articles Are an Antidote to Political Correctness [150 words]David l. ThomsonMay 28, 2002 20:50
Statistics Aren't Enough [259 words]Sam LahiriMay 28, 2002 20:44
The State Department's Consistent Position [181 words]Glenn KlotzMay 28, 2002 20:35
Brain on Drugs [104 words]Steven AbramsMay 28, 2002 19:43
Yes!! Keep Getting the Word Out!! [50 words]Jan BruggemanMay 28, 2002 18:26
Show the government we're concerned [224 words]Doody KaminskieMay 28, 2002 16:21
State Department's Pro-Arab Bias [19 words]Arnold H. KlauMay 28, 2002 15:54
Disturbing... [34 words]Jerry GornishMay 28, 2002 11:35
Another Great Piece! [47 words]Y. EdelsteinMay 28, 2002 10:51
Right on! [136 words]Susan Schwartz WaplesMay 28, 2002 10:35
Please Keep It Up! [38 words]Dixon PorterMay 28, 2002 07:59
Congressional Hearings about State Should be Convened [27 words]Michael RifkinMay 28, 2002 07:43
Another Slippery Tactic? [143 words]Rochelle WolfMay 28, 2002 07:32

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page