Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Steps necessary for destroying Islamic Terrorism
Reader comment on item: Capturing Osama
in response to reader comment: Virulent ideology

Submitted by Shunil Prantor (Japan), Jul 26, 2006 at 02:32

1. Get 100 famous high energy physicists around the glove and give them 100 million of funding each for 5 years to find out alternative of fossil fuel. It is already possible. The science is known. It has not happened because 1 liter of petroleum costs less than 1 liter of purified bottled water. While oil was cheaper, the costs of flowing dollar to rouge Islamic countries are huge. Imagine the cost of homeland security in all non-islamic countries. What for? almost 99% for the existence of their sizeable muslim population and militants of Islam. There are more Hindus in America, Canada, Australia and Europe than muslims. Did anybody hear a single Hindu is involved in bombings, kidnappings etc.? The best way to kill cancer is to stop supply blood in it.

2. Follow a strict non-religious curriculum. Stop Islamic teachings in the heartland of civilization because it teaches hatred, violence, polygamism, biasness against women, provocation against non-believers (infidel) and no respect for animal pain. Moreover, bring the school curriculum of Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and all Islamic schools for debating in UN. If it follows the above, force those states for the changes either diplomatically, if it does not work by sanctions.

3. With the help of multinational spy agencies and based on consistent reports, find the states who are members of the UN but involved in state sponsored terrorism, bring them in Hague for justice as Melosovic got. States who are signatories of uphelding human right, women right, animal right and liability to protection of minorities, their cultures, and assets, monitor their activities regularly by regional UN commissionar ( a cross-country national) and calculate the amount of donation, money help, food supply, medical supply to those countries directly related to their overall evaluation in these grounds.

4. Held liable to the individual governmet of certain country which contributed the most terrorists in international destruction. Suppose, India claims that Pakistani and Bangladeshi Islamic terrors contributed 99% of the sufferings of this single country and they possesses hubndreds of terrorist training centers in their sovereign areas. If this is true, regardless of mean politics of cold war, and hot war, bring the head of those countries in UN and cross-justify the causes.

5. Use the formula of simple algebra. Minus times minus is plus. Use enemy of the fundamental Islam, help them morally, politically.

6. While muslims can build thousands of mosque in non-islamic lands, a Saudi Arabian Christian cannot buy a Christmas tree in Saudi Arabia. Dont bring this evil to Texas ranch rather ask him ,,, WHY,,, WHY>>>

7. Dont be soft on terrorism like India. Indian muslims 90% of them voted for separation. They killed, they got their Islamic homeland and now they again kill. They again want another piece of land. It will be same in every parts of the world. Someday not very far. It is politically incorrect to say, but 100% true in reality.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (29) on this item

Title By Date
Islam and Militant Islam, same thing [451 words]K JacksonMar 22, 2004 13:25
Bush is neither fighting a war against global terror nor is he a friend to Israel [583 words]Dafna YeeMar 20, 2004 13:22
Virulent ideology [66 words]Elie KhawandMar 16, 2004 09:46
Osama factor is less important [301 words]Nirmal AkashJul 20, 2006 03:41
Global Integrity and consistency are more vital in terror fighting [376 words]Shushil BatashJul 25, 2006 02:37
⇒ Steps necessary for destroying Islamic Terrorism [489 words]Shunil PrantorJul 26, 2006 02:32
the real cause of terrorism [444 words]samreenJul 17, 2008 16:14
Sorry Mr. Kerry, The Spanish beat you to it. [205 words]YonasonMar 15, 2004 18:33
Capturing Osama [100 words]S.C.PandaMar 15, 2004 04:29
re: Kerry and terrorism [106 words]James A. BushMar 12, 2004 23:15
The Size of Jihadism [91 words]Timothy RobertsMar 11, 2004 20:16
I Agree [149 words]Mohamed Ahmed BerrayMar 11, 2004 08:58
You are right [190 words]YoniMar 10, 2004 16:27
Great points [9 words]Ray AtwoodMar 10, 2004 13:17
Islamism [237 words]John McClainMar 10, 2004 11:53
Killing Osama only short term benefit [179 words]Darwin BarrettMar 9, 2004 19:28
The battle of ideas [90 words]Martin LindeskogMar 9, 2004 17:12
EU pandering [87 words]Daniel MiddlemanMar 9, 2004 16:23
support for bush reelection [18 words]Jack GoldbergMar 9, 2004 16:18
Bush or Kerry, who would be worse for defense? [281 words]Maryallene OtisMar 9, 2004 16:11
Islamic Radicals, the Modern Neanderthals [291 words]Joseph E BentzelMar 9, 2004 13:20
Endorsement of Bush for President? [451 words]lee CharendoffMar 9, 2004 12:59
Political Stupidity [187 words]JimSMar 9, 2004 12:23
no point in gratuitously antagonizing a possible next president [88 words]Marvin RabinovitchMar 9, 2004 10:45
Spinning Capture of Osama [55 words]alan septimusMar 9, 2004 10:26
Thank you [230 words]BrettMar 9, 2004 09:55
Capturing Bin Laden & Re-Election of Pres. Bush [126 words]Tova MatteroMar 9, 2004 08:24
The bigger threat [304 words]Vijay DandapaniMar 9, 2004 08:11
Getting Bin Laden [137 words]Peter J. HerzMar 9, 2004 06:55

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page