No, not the best idea

Submitted by rwtw (Australia), Jul 19, 2006 at 06:31

Further to the comment by Carl Goldberg - I agree with what Dr Pipes says - not to read it - particularly remembering that he says not to read it for political insight.

My reasons are two.

Firstly, to do with the nature of the Koran. I don't have the quote to hand, since I am just replying to the blog entry - Thomas Carlyle has an eloquent statement to the effect that the Koran is such a confused, inchoate mess as to be beyond the patience of any educated westerner. The quote is worth looking for. It is not a readable book - you won't get through it.

Secondly, more pertinently : my reading suggests that the sources for modern Islamism are only remotely to be found in the Koran. To be sure people like Qutb, who, I understand, was a vital player in legitimizing political violence in the modern world, find their source in the Koran, but it is their interpretation which is behind the proliferating violence - you won't find it directly in the Koran.

I think the general reader would do well to defer to the scholar in this instance - follow Dr Pipes' advice.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".