Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Reply
Reader comment on item: The "New York Review of Books" Mangles Campus Watch
in response to reader comment: exempt from criticism

Submitted by S.H. (Canada), Jul 16, 2006 at 23:50

I'm not being sensitive or thin skinned. I'm just saying don't blame the 'centuries old text' or the faith. That is unadulterated. However the fashion in which it is interpreted by its followers is not, neither is their view of how it should be implemented in modern society.

Bombing Islam into submission and wiping it off the map will not help. Violence breeds more violence. Instead it is more sensible to address and contemplate the issue of working together with each other peacefully to attain a common, effective and peaceful goal. Helping Muslims to realise that their religion can be applied peacefully and constructively in today's society should be the goal instead.

You ask how these 'documents' are upheld? Consider the many Muslims throughout the world, who on behalf of their faith, demonstrate actively on issues such as poverty, homelessness, international aide, charity and fair business practices. Those who help to provide services in their communities and their neighborhoods. Those abroad who work towards peace with others. Those who have a drive to do good deeds in their everyday life simply because it is a criterion of being a Muslim. Therefore is it Islam that has a fault, or the people who live today and follow it improperly.

Blaming Islam is a sidetrack. Instead blame the real sources of the problem. There are so many. Poverty, lack of knowledge, societal issues within communities. All this results in what? People will think they have nothing else they can do about their own situation other than fight for it. And thinking that terrorism is a valid output for that, they will commit themselves to it (whereas it is not valid).

Guidelines are usually thought over and made so that they will be perfect. If everyone in the US followed the Constitution, no one would have any problems with the US. If everyone in Islam followed their faith, no one would have any problems with Muslims.

And I'd rather be sensitive, thin skinned and open minded, than cold and blunt.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (21) on this item

Title By Date
The Most Ignorant and Obtuse [109 words]DickardJul 18, 2006 13:08
another reason why "US policy on Israeli–Palestinian issues has been so unbalanced" [37 words]MichaelJul 17, 2006 11:44
The "New York Review of Books" Mangles Campus Watch [25 words]steven LJul 16, 2006 20:15
And Mr. Massing's Point is? [96 words]Michael WolinJul 12, 2006 03:39
the real conspiracy [100 words]bobJul 10, 2006 14:59
I'm with you Bob [549 words]NickJul 11, 2006 23:17
A Comment that is Factually Incorrect [316 words]K OJul 12, 2006 22:30
There is no conspiracy [222 words]S.HJul 14, 2006 16:54
Are you kidding me?! [41 words]Kevin MJul 14, 2006 18:54
S.H. /Islam, misunderstood again ! [145 words]joe kaffirJul 15, 2006 13:30
No. I'm not. [43 words]S.HJul 15, 2006 22:48
To Joe Kaffir [193 words]S.HJul 15, 2006 22:58
exempt from criticism [91 words]LeonardJul 16, 2006 20:29
⇒ Reply [337 words]S.H.Jul 16, 2006 23:50
Muslim Students at USC Support Al Qaeda? [44 words]EdenJul 8, 2006 00:37
Fear and loathing at the New York Review of books! [77 words]scribeJul 6, 2006 19:30
israel being shielded? [72 words]DavidJul 6, 2006 18:51
I know of no other network...concerned with the Middle East that has comparable...power [179 words]QuijyboJul 5, 2006 21:55
To Mr. Massing and his types [334 words]G.BisvasJul 4, 2006 12:42
Shielding Israel from Pressure [75 words]CKJul 3, 2006 01:10
Is this guy on some kind of drug?!? [69 words]D WolfJul 1, 2006 16:00

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page