Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

To Joe Kaffir
Reader comment on item: The "New York Review of Books" Mangles Campus Watch
in response to reader comment: S.H. /Islam, misunderstood again !

Submitted by S.H (Canada), Jul 15, 2006 at 22:58

I'm not sure if what you're saying is sarcasm lol, but anyway. How many Christians do you know who completely understand and practice Christianity. How many Hindus do you meet who completely understand and practice Hinduism. How man Jews do you meet who completely understand and practice Judaism. All religions you will realise, at their core, taught peace, love and understanding. Over time people make up their own misconceptions based on what they want for themselves, and what they want to believe in, without completely reading their original scripts and listening to what they hear through word of mouth from others. In the same way, how many Muslims do you meet who completely understand and practice Islam?

Not many, from any faith. I have enough friends from each faith to understand that much.

And sorry If you find it offensive, I will refrain from it, but if you don't like Non-muslim, would you want to be called a Muslim in that regard then? Doesn't make much sense to me. However if you find that offensive I will call you by what you wish to be called.

Sorry If I come across as offensive.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (21) on this item

Title By Date
The Most Ignorant and Obtuse [109 words]DickardJul 18, 2006 13:08
another reason why "US policy on Israeli–Palestinian issues has been so unbalanced" [37 words]MichaelJul 17, 2006 11:44
The "New York Review of Books" Mangles Campus Watch [25 words]steven LJul 16, 2006 20:15
And Mr. Massing's Point is? [96 words]Michael WolinJul 12, 2006 03:39
the real conspiracy [100 words]bobJul 10, 2006 14:59
I'm with you Bob [549 words]NickJul 11, 2006 23:17
A Comment that is Factually Incorrect [316 words]K OJul 12, 2006 22:30
There is no conspiracy [222 words]S.HJul 14, 2006 16:54
Are you kidding me?! [41 words]Kevin MJul 14, 2006 18:54
S.H. /Islam, misunderstood again ! [145 words]joe kaffirJul 15, 2006 13:30
No. I'm not. [43 words]S.HJul 15, 2006 22:48
⇒ To Joe Kaffir [193 words]S.HJul 15, 2006 22:58
exempt from criticism [91 words]LeonardJul 16, 2006 20:29
Reply [337 words]S.H.Jul 16, 2006 23:50
Muslim Students at USC Support Al Qaeda? [44 words]EdenJul 8, 2006 00:37
Fear and loathing at the New York Review of books! [77 words]scribeJul 6, 2006 19:30
israel being shielded? [72 words]DavidJul 6, 2006 18:51
I know of no other network...concerned with the Middle East that has comparable...power [179 words]QuijyboJul 5, 2006 21:55
To Mr. Massing and his types [334 words]G.BisvasJul 4, 2006 12:42
Shielding Israel from Pressure [75 words]CKJul 3, 2006 01:10
Is this guy on some kind of drug?!? [69 words]D WolfJul 1, 2006 16:00

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page