Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site
Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search

Well deserved
Reader comment on item: John Esposito and Karen Armstrong – Banned in Malaysia

Submitted by Vijay (United Kingdom), Jul 14, 2006 at 06:00

This is the so called "moderate Muslim" country of Malaysia. Even the apologists and crypto-dhimmis like Esposito and Armstrong are verboten.

Reminds one of Robert Fisk of The Independent, for all his years of anti-western and pro-islamic fundemenalist writings, was beaten up senseless by Muslims in Pakistan.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (14) on this item

Title By Date
Karen Armstrong is a wannabe historian [66 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 13, 2008 18:58
Don't Give a Toot to the Malaysian Internal Security Ministry [200 words]Marco HiirataFeb 13, 2008 12:51
full List of books banned [253 words]Ipnat DrosotFeb 9, 2008 11:48
Malaysia looks to be a very dangerous and obscure nation [117 words]YnnatchkahFeb 2, 2008 17:18
↔ Malaysia is not yet dangerous [202 words]John BastileFeb 3, 2008 00:59
↔ Book ban: The 'two faces' of Islam Hadhari [460 words]Ismail Che YahayaFeb 11, 2008 14:51
↔ Dear Messrs. Ynnatchkah & Bastile [680 words]Marco HiirataFeb 13, 2008 21:42
↔ nurturing prejudices [157 words]bibliobibuliMar 10, 2008 00:26
↔ You replied against prejudices with your own prejudices [547 words]John BastileApr 8, 2008 21:58
Well deserved [14 words]VijayFeb 1, 2008 04:39
Are you sure they banned a book ? ? ? [211 words]Phil GreendJul 17, 2007 15:32
Research Armstrong's doctrine before banning [311 words]Tommy PetersJun 28, 2007 21:28
Is there a reason?
[w/response] [38 words]		MuslihoonJul 16, 2006 04:16
⇒ Well deserved [47 words]VijayJul 14, 2006 06:00

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page