Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

no recognition of Palestinians, the stateless Arabs of the Levant
Reader comment on item: Thoughts on the Israeli Incursion into Gaza

Submitted by Jonathan Usher (Canada), Jul 1, 2006 at 10:40

Your comments were correct then. However Hamas has put a completely new look on the P.A. Firstly Hamas obviously has the support of most Palestinians. Therefore Hamas and the Palestinians are not two separate entities but one coherent whole. Most importantly, Hamas has proved time and time again in the last few months that it is more interested in the destruction of Israel then improving the lot of the Palestinians.

Now the only answer seems to be to withdraw recognition of the Palestinians as a people. Before 1900 the Arabs in the general area of Jordan and Israel there were just Arabs eaking out a poor living as tenant farmers. There was no group called Palestinians or state called Palestine. Before 1964 when the PLO was founded these Arabs were were not a people and did not claim to be a people. Now most of them are Jordanians, about a million are Israelis, and about 3 million living in Gaza and the West Bank as terroriists who carry guns and wear balaclavas. These latter don't deserve or need to be a "people" and they certainly are undeserving of representing all the Arabs in the Levant. The terrorist propaganda dream of a Palestinian people in a new state of Palestine that will defeat Israel and then be a leader in the expansion of Islamic conquest must be ended.

The overlooked and tough solution is to divide the West Bank and Gaza between Israel, Jordan, and Egypt. There is no need or reason to create a new Fundamentalist Islamic Palestinian terrorist state when there are three states in which Arabs can find a peaceful home.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (40) on this item

Title By Date
Canadians killed in Lebanon
[w/response] [77 words]
Michael McNaughtonJul 18, 2006 12:58
Gaza invasion
[w/response] [121 words]
Robert SolotJul 14, 2006 11:52
WHO is Israel fighting ? [92 words]Henry EfroymsonJul 14, 2006 10:38
SELF RESTRAINT IS FATAL [1143 words]FERN SIDMANJul 13, 2006 14:43
Again HUMANE & Super- restrained Israel only attacks terrorists after warning to civilians to evacuate [266 words]FreeNov 27, 2006 14:14
Agreement with most, but not all... [79 words]orange yonasonJul 2, 2006 19:00
One more thing Israel should do for every suicide bombing [49 words]EstherJul 1, 2006 19:40
⇒ no recognition of Palestinians, the stateless Arabs of the Levant [273 words]Jonathan UsherJul 1, 2006 10:40
comments in old testament [177 words]Jonathan UsherSep 4, 2007 06:50
Palestine is mentioned in Genesis [135 words]mary sparrowdancerSep 4, 2007 17:44
Your first mistake is thinking that today's Palestinians have ANYTHING to do with Phillistines...! [171 words]sarahSep 5, 2007 23:40
mary sparrowdancer is dead wrong [30 words]KlewSep 6, 2007 02:15
And do you claim to be "American?" [66 words]mary sparrowdancerSep 14, 2007 17:50
Klew is wrong [40 words]mary sparrowdancerSep 14, 2007 17:53
Re: #659: Pipes explains in NY Sun "How Israel Can Win"; and #657
[w/response] [362 words]
Richard FinnJul 1, 2006 08:22
Can't rule Palestinians in 21st century the way the British ruled India in the 19th century
[w/response] [294 words]
Ian MordantJul 1, 2006 06:44
Can't rule palestine in the 21st century.......... [48 words]JoeJul 5, 2006 07:13
A Simpler Solution [129 words]PTJul 1, 2006 03:47
Thoughts on the Israeli Incursion into Gaza [36 words]steven lJun 30, 2006 21:32
End of two-state travesty [352 words]markJun 30, 2006 19:21
"Walls have only limited utility..." True, but... [140 words]ElaineJun 30, 2006 17:21
Points more relevant today than ever. [24 words]LouJun 30, 2006 15:50
Save Your Breath [150 words]DebbyJun 30, 2006 17:21
Debby I'm with you every word, and I live in Israel almost 60 years. [95 words]BruriaJul 1, 2006 11:04
Thankfully I never moved to Israel [124 words]Jeff BurkeJul 5, 2006 18:59
Gaza invasion
[w/response] [69 words]
Robert SolotJun 30, 2006 14:25
الغدر سبب فشل السلام [252 words]mohamed .mJun 30, 2006 14:12
The Limited Elasticity of Appeasement [470 words]AlexJun 29, 2006 14:17
Gaza invasion [59 words]Robert SolotJun 30, 2006 14:32
Exchange Rate [41 words]WolfJul 1, 2006 00:57
THIS NONSENSE HAS GOT TO STOP! [226 words]bobJun 29, 2006 13:17
Gaza re-entry [91 words]Steve GureJun 30, 2006 13:39
Good Idea [21 words]Mark RothJun 29, 2006 11:48
Excellent proposals, but how many more Jewish dead before the Israeli government implements them?
[w/response] [52 words]
mhlJun 29, 2006 10:23
Thoughts on Gaza Incursion- not accurate
[w/response] [158 words]
Andy B.Jun 29, 2006 09:39
Why the death penalty will not work [293 words]Pro-Israeli DemocratJun 29, 2006 09:05
results of international funding for the PA [136 words]michael cJun 29, 2006 07:48
thoughts on the Israeli incursion into Gaza [134 words]joeJun 29, 2006 04:47
Wake Up World [109 words]MartynJul 14, 2006 17:34
The fence is good [146 words]Henrik R ClausenJun 29, 2006 03:50

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page