Submitted by Paul Jones(United States), May 23, 2002 at 12:27
Though the "ophthamologist" who runs Syria may use old-school anti--Semitism and public bravado about Syria's non-conventional capabilities against Israel, I think even the son-of-the-father must know that if Syria dared to use chemical or biological weapons against Israel (along with a high Israeli casualty count), a country founded to protect Jews fron EVER being gassed again, the chance of a severe nuclear retaliation would be inevitable.
That's why I beleive that the other paper-tiger, Saddam, did not hit Israel with any scuds armed with chemical war-heads...the risk of severe nuclear retaliation would have been a bit much for the "Lion of Islam" to bear.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.