Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site
Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search

Who Will Indict the UN for Aiding & Abetting Terror?
Reader comment on item: [Is Israel] Winning by retreating?

Submitted by Ben Shniper (United States), May 22, 2002 at 16:00

With the UN being worse than useless in their stated mission of defending Israel against attacks by Lebanese, why does Israel sit on its hands instead of accusing the UN of aiding terrorists? With their additional complicity in the horrors of Jenin, where militants sent almost two dozen suicide attackers and killed almost two dozen Israelis during raids, who is watching the UN?

Is it the UN's stated goal to help Palestinian terrorism? I didn't see that in the UN charter.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (25) on this item

Title By Date
USA's foriegn policy in denial (and irrelevant?) [374 words]Shep FargotsteinNov 12, 2002 12:21
defeat of the palestinians [259 words]scott rosmarinMay 28, 2002 12:20
Response to Juan Cienaguas "Israel's Mistake is the Settlements" [1084 words]Mike NargizianMay 27, 2002 17:32
Response to: Your Bias is Showing [229 words]"An American-Israeli"May 27, 2002 05:32
Response to Two Other Comments [163 words]William J. SturmMay 26, 2002 23:51
Why Is There Only One Form of Bias? [169 words]John BucknerMay 26, 2002 22:48
The Peril of Appeasement [126 words]B KostynuikMay 26, 2002 20:42
How to End Rejectionism [493 words]Gary BlackMay 24, 2002 17:47
Other Land for Peace Failures [18 words]Shep FargotsteinMay 24, 2002 12:53
Peace Will Never Come With Arafat [151 words]Neal BishopMay 23, 2002 20:21
it's life not economy... [109 words]Doody KaminskieMay 23, 2002 15:01
Israel's Mistake is the Settlements [56 words]Juan CienaguasMay 23, 2002 14:32
Syria's Fear of Nuclear Response [103 words]Paul JonesMay 23, 2002 12:27
No Condition Exists for Peace [195 words]Glenn KlotzMay 23, 2002 09:10
Waiting for the Next Attack [171 words]Jeff BercovitchMay 23, 2002 08:46
Your Bias is Showing [50 words]Muhammad SiddiquiMay 23, 2002 00:44
Logical Common Sense [40 words]Henry GottesmanMay 22, 2002 23:01
Teaching the Saudis [354 words]Janet GodfreyMay 22, 2002 16:10
⇒ Who Will Indict the UN for Aiding & Abetting Terror? [80 words]Ben ShniperMay 22, 2002 16:00
Israel's Options [297 words]Ken PlattMay 22, 2002 13:45
Tel Aviv is a Settlement! [17 words]Paul FinbergMay 22, 2002 10:51
Right Again! [10 words]William J. SturmMay 22, 2002 10:07
A Voice in the Wilderness [126 words]Mildred MallekMay 22, 2002 08:57
The West Never Learns [57 words]Michael RifkinMay 22, 2002 08:15
Achieving Calm [75 words]Allen MinitzerMay 22, 2002 07:53

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page