Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

The Quran a Divine Miracle?
Reader comment on item: More on the North Carolina Jihadi, Mohammed Taheri-azar

Submitted by Roy Weinberg (United States), Mar 19, 2006 at 15:19

If Mohammed Taheri-azar and his fellow Muslim fundamentalists truly believe that the Quran came directly from God, then they have some explaining to do.

They can start by explaining to all of us ignorant "dhimmis" why the Quran contains two conflicting accounts of creation. Sura 41:9-12 claims that God created the heavens and earth in eight days while Sura 7:51 and Sura 10:3 claim that God created the heavens and earth in only six days. Well, which is it?

I would also like Taheri-azar to explain why the Quran contains four conflicting accounts of how the Quran was revealed to Mohammed. For example, Suras 53:2-18 and 81:19-24 claim that "Allah" personally appeared to Mohammed to reveal the Quran while Sura 2:97 claims that the angel Gabriel appeared to Mohammed to reveal the Quran to him. Again, which is it?

Taheri-azar may also want to explain why some of the scriptures in the Quran seem to have been lifted directly from such Jewish sources as the Talmud and the Midrash Rabbah. For example, the story of Abraham being rescued from Nimrod's fire (Suras 21:51-71; 29:16-17, 37:97-98) comes directly from the Midrash Rabbah which predates the Quran by several centuries.

The Quran also claims that Jesus' mother Mary was the sister of Moses. (Sura 19:28) Needless to say, that is fallacious.

If the Quran truly came from God, then we have to conclude that either God must be suffering from senile dementia or he is in serious need of a copy editor. Reality tells us clearly that the Quran never came from God ...

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (19) on this item

Title By Date
cult like behavior [82 words]Phil GreendJun 3, 2007 11:42
Anguished Swan Songs from All of Our Slippery Rocks [316 words]Lucky O'DalyApr 12, 2006 07:12
North Carolina ties to London bomber suspect [171 words]LApr 7, 2006 11:29
Hisham Sarsour [516 words]Mohammad SarsourJan 3, 2007 03:15
Not anti-American?! [101 words]TheocriticApr 6, 2006 15:07
NC gun law saved lives. Now, if we could only protect ourselves from SUVs! [136 words]GregApr 1, 2006 19:29
"Kind and gentle" terrorists : What would Mohammed drive? [199 words]Ben van de PolderMar 28, 2006 08:42
Sad, for a lot of reasons [96 words]Taj AshaheedMar 28, 2006 01:33
Pity the Mindless [60 words]Thomas BaileyMar 26, 2006 03:17
Mindless? [68 words]DaveApr 9, 2006 14:25
Taheri-azar [72 words]anonymousMar 25, 2006 15:51
⇒ The Quran a Divine Miracle? [260 words]Roy WeinbergMar 19, 2006 15:19
Plain wrong!! Th Qur'an is not a divine miracle [354 words]LactantiusMar 21, 2006 05:50
plain wrong- to lactantius. [38 words]saqApr 1, 2006 16:33
questions ... [87 words]CharlesApr 3, 2006 02:31
Roy Weinberg's doubt [122 words]MacJul 1, 2009 22:17
Just Following Orders [117 words]DaisyMar 19, 2006 13:09
isalm here to dominate. [66 words]saqApr 1, 2006 16:39
....and yet.... [75 words]yadayadaJun 15, 2006 05:39

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page