Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

The lesson of the day is 'Responsibility'
Reader comment on item: Monitoring Iraqis Living in the United States

Submitted by RM Paine (Australia), Nov 20, 2002 at 09:34

My Message to Abi Nader:

I didn't hear you mention the word Responsibility, and, come to think of it, I haven't heard a single Muslim/Islamic mention the word Responsibility as it applies to Muslims. Let us put it this way, you are most certainly responsible until you're proven otherwise--- we are at WAR. So show us where you stand and don't tell us how we "must" fight the war unless you are going to help!

It sounds like you want us and our President to be subjugated to your demands, so let's get things straight from the beginning. Can you show us a single Muslim/Islamic State (or is it "Holy State") that can make the claims that you are demanding of the people of the United States, "intelligently and sensibly" in its governance? Give us one single example of a Muslim/Islamic State that operates "intelligently and sensibly" in the following ways :

1) Women's Rights;
2) Religious Rights;
3) Separation of Government and Religion;
4) Human Rights.

It is the responsibility of every Muslim in the West to show his true colors, to stand up and be counted for peace. It is the responsibility of every Muslim in the West NOT to make it more difficult for, or impede us from dealing with the real terrorism dangers that we face. And it is the responsibility of every Muslim in the West to alert the authorities, those in danger and even take action against other Muslims when he or she sees, hears, or reads about Muslim planning of terrorist attacks. This is the only way that trust will begin to grow, and that you ( Abi Nadir) will start to truly help your people, Muslims.

No more excuses!
RM Paine

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (22) on this item

Title By Date
Paula Zahn bias [65 words]EricOct 28, 2004 20:36
Racial profiling or not? - who cares! [450 words]FarzadFeb 18, 2003 02:31
Native Americans should have monitored Europeans [28 words]MichelleFeb 13, 2003 13:07
In for a penny, in for a pound [67 words]Kim S. Barban.Jan 23, 2003 09:16
Fatal Conditions [36 words]Jan WolfsburgDec 6, 2002 16:11
Monitoring Iraqis Living in the United States [358 words]Arlinda M. De AngelisNov 27, 2002 10:41
Paula Zahn's bias is showing [55 words]Dr William ClaytonNov 24, 2002 16:30
Profiling [123 words]Del RoachSep 14, 2006 20:29
Profiling Iraqi Americans [192 words]Andrea HyattNov 23, 2002 01:51
Slight of mind [289 words]RjhylandNov 22, 2002 15:59
Face the facts. [143 words]AdrianNov 22, 2002 07:44
Let's imagine, for a moment [125 words]Boris FrenkelNov 21, 2002 16:56
Rationale [133 words]MontyNov 21, 2002 15:49
REALLY? [66 words]PattyNov 21, 2002 08:43
Arab Enclaves? This isn't the Middle East [142 words]BobNov 20, 2002 20:58
Agree with Comments on Paula Zahn show Nov 18th [179 words]Warren SmithNov 20, 2002 18:23
Civil liberties-really? [251 words]Barry ShmooklerNov 20, 2002 18:07
Arab Community Leaders? [132 words]GaryNov 20, 2002 16:55
Pleased [52 words]Ron WeinerNov 20, 2002 15:55
Reality trumps feelings [114 words]William ZelkoNov 20, 2002 15:37
Community Leaders? [Response to Nadir] [136 words]DavidNov 20, 2002 09:48
⇒ The lesson of the day is 'Responsibility' [280 words]RM PaineNov 20, 2002 09:34

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page