1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

You're still not answering Ahmad

Reader comment on item: Pope Benedict XVI and the Koran
in response to reader comment: Oh For GODS Sake!

Submitted by Joe (United States), Mar 16, 2006 at 14:57

Ahmad, you are still not saying what we didn't understand, or what we missed. This is the epitome of Muslim ideology, that we are wrong somewhere, no one knows why.

Where did the Jews go wrong?
Where did the Christians go wrong?
What in their teachings is contradictory to seeking God?

You say that we went wrong, but you are not saying how or why or providing any evidence. Unlike what you think, Jesus did not refute the laws of the Jews, he reaffirmed them:

Matthew 5:17-20
"Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them. For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the law until all is accomplished. Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

You say "the message was clear, but they didn't get it"; here, Jesus clearly says that he is fulfilling them. Jesus revealed more to the law, and re-emphasized the important aspects of the Laws of God. Jesus did not say that the Jews were at "variance" with anything, as Muhammad said about the Christians and the Jews.

Muhammad added to the story (even if questionable material), and claimed that there were distortions in the other texts. Jesus did not. What did we miss then? At least we know of one rule the Muslims left, consequently the most important of them all: The Golden Rule.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to You're still not answering Ahmad by Joe

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)