Submitted by donvan (United States), Mar 10, 2006 at 17:01
This is a wedge issue to ingratiate the islamics to the other religious nut cases who are spokesmen for god. I have no sympathy for the "Homosexual agenda", but I feel much more at ease among homosexuals than islamics. The politicians in the "Britistan" are not afraid that the homosexuals will self detonate, they know muslims,at least some of them, will. As the West slips into the sunset of its history, all politicians can be expected to seek favor of Muslims. Womens rights will be next. The appeal of the subjugation of women is strong. Many men will embrace the notion of women as second class status. The progress of women can be reversed quite easily, just as the homosexual can. To the Islamics, women and homosexuals are easy. They will submit easily. Chistian and Jewish men will pose somewhat more of a challenge. But they will give only token resistance. The Islamic invitation of absolute male supremacy is strong.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
Reader comments (2) on this item
| Title |
By |
Date |
| That dog don't hunt [110 words] | Mark | Mar 9, 2006 12:40 | | ↔ ⇒ The camels nose.. [160 words] | donvan | Mar 10, 2006 17:01 |
Comment on this item
See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.
|