69 million page views

version corrected for diplomatic resons? likely

Reader comment on item: A Key Change to "The Pope and the Koran"

Submitted by bruno (Italy), Feb 6, 2006 at 15:21

There are strong voices circulating inside the Vatican at an high level that the first version, that of an "irreformabile" ,i.e. unreformable islam be the right one.

So most likely the Pope said it in a bout of candor, in a trusted circle of friends and ex-pupils, but the phrase is to be kept secret because it could be damaging to the vatican traditional prudent approach to such problems.

It is not a secret that the Church avoided direct word confrontation with national - socialism while actually disapproving strongly with its persecution of the hebrew and slavic peoples, so most likely this is today's approach with Islam.

The Vatican hyerarchy seems to be quite worried about the islamic advance in Europe, a reporter recently said that a bishop, speaking at a private dinner to qualified people, anticipated the forecasting of an islamic Europe by Lewis of several decades, mantaining that Europe will likely be islamicized not in one hundred years, but in a few decades.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (34) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Another Lie [35 words]AaronMay 7, 2006 07:2544977
A French newspaper [141 words]Kees RudolfApr 21, 2006 16:2043756
Goosa [11 words]RajJul 19, 2009 15:2243756
Don't over-react to what Fessio thinks he understood what Pope said [165 words]SA FranceApr 5, 2006 10:1542450
WITHOUT CHRIST [99 words]donvanMar 8, 2006 17:2839419
Peace [91 words]JumanaMar 7, 2006 23:4839296
1Struggling with Identity of Islam [304 words]PonderingFeb 23, 2006 04:0837549
1Qu'ran or Islam [109 words]tellisMar 16, 2006 20:0037549
struggling Identity [60 words]observerSep 26, 2006 00:4837549
Keep dreaming [171 words]NOORFeb 19, 2006 02:1236302
Hey, then please go back to that and let us be!!! [136 words]AnneMay 6, 2006 12:2336302
Leave us alone [62 words]Octavio JohansonMay 6, 2006 17:5236302
version corrected for diplomatic resons? likely [162 words]brunoFeb 6, 2006 15:2133952
Expounding On Ambiguity? [563 words]orange yonasonJan 31, 2006 16:0833309
Conspiracies to Control The World [810 words]howlinJan 30, 2006 16:2133146
kuran and reform [134 words]G.BisvasJan 31, 2006 12:5533146
Reply to Howlin [353 words]No DhimmiJan 31, 2006 22:0733146
No Dhimmi [60 words]howlinFeb 1, 2006 12:1833146
Reforming Barbarians [359 words]orange yonasonFeb 1, 2006 14:2233146
Howling at Howlin: Learn the Facts [635 words]JoeFeb 14, 2006 22:0233146
an all out effort [76 words]donvanFeb 21, 2006 13:4833146
To Joe: [29 words]jeffreybFeb 25, 2006 23:0833146
reply to Jeffery, here is the proof [52 words]JoeFeb 28, 2006 00:2233146
To Joe [99 words]jeffreybFeb 28, 2006 16:1533146
again [666 words]JoeMar 1, 2006 13:2533146
To Joe [23 words]jeffreybMar 1, 2006 16:4033146
Does Benedict XVI agree with Ratzinger? [473 words]Tom McLaughlinJan 30, 2006 09:1333097
Conditions for Changing Islam [553 words]Mike RamirezJan 29, 2006 18:4033045
Last chance to turn this around? [284 words]Darwin barrettJan 29, 2006 17:3333037
The compounding of error [284 words]WilliamJan 29, 2006 09:0633001
Comments by William [15 words]JerryJan 29, 2006 20:0633001
oil and women [72 words]yuval brandstetterJan 29, 2006 08:4032998
why u people see only one side of picture [42 words]Ahsan HussainJan 30, 2006 08:5932998
Comment to #643 Correction to Pope and the Koran [135 words]William Sumner ScottJan 29, 2006 04:2932982

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to version corrected for diplomatic resons? likely by bruno

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)