Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Conditions for Changing Islam
Reader comment on item: A Key Change to "The Pope and the Koran"

Submitted by Mike Ramirez (United States), Jan 29, 2006 at 18:40

Actually, yes, the Qur'anic verses in Islam were able to change throughout the period when Muhammad was alive. There are many examples of this including Salman Rushdie's account of the "Satanic Verses" which had been originally written in the Qur'an then later abrogated.

There are yet other verses that were changed, however, it must be emphasized that when these changes were made, they were done so at a theological level and through a "Revelation to Muhammad." Such other "revelation" is when Muhammad decided to change the direction of prayer for Muslims and ordered them to no longer pray toward Jerusalem but to turn their back against Jerusalem and pray toward Mecca. This was the result of the Jews rejecting Muhammad as their prophet. About this time is also when Muhammad received his revelation to change the Muslim attitude toward Jews and Christians and thus imposed the tax (jizyah) upon those who did not convert to Islam. Later revelations called for stricter penalties and death toward unbelievers (Kafir) who would not accept Islam and Muhammad as the "final prophet of God.".

It is also interesting to note that, according to Islamic theology, the ideas for a verse did not always come from "Allah" but were also products of suggestion by one or more of the "companions" of Muhammad who had influenced his writings. These were structured so as to make it appear that they were "divine revelations" but their "human influences" become obvious in the Ahadith (sayings of Muhammad).

Here is proof that one or more of Muhammad's companions made a suggestion that resulted in a "divine revelation" that was later written into the Qur'an:
(from Sahih Bukhari: Volume 1, Book 8, Number 395: Narrated 'Umar bin Al-Khattab)

"My Lord agreed with me in three things:
1. I said,"O Allah's Apostle, I wish we took the station of Abraham as our praying place (for some of our prayers). So came the Divine Inspiration: And take you (people) the station of Abraham as a place of prayer (for some of your prayers e.g. two Rakat of Tawaf of Ka'ba)". (2.125)

2. And as regards the (verse of) the veiling of the women, I said, 'O Allah's Apostle! I wish you ordered your wives to cover themselves from the men because good and bad ones talk to them.' So the verse of the veiling of the women was revealed.

3. Once the wives of the Prophet made a united front against the Prophet and I said to them, 'It may be if he (the Prophet) divorced you, (all) that his Lord (Allah) will give him instead of you wives better than you.' So this verse (the same as I had said) was revealed." (66.5).

Conclusion: It appears that the only way that Muslims will accept a "change" in the Qur'an is through a "Divine Revelation." Since Muhammad has been deemed the "Last and Final Prophet of Allah" and is no longer alive, the question would now be: Who is able to qualify as an authoritative leader of Islam with the ability to make the change? The only acceptable answer is an Islamic Caliphate. But then the Caliphate would still proclaim that the entire world needs to be brought under the subjection of Islam and Shari'a rule. So, we are back to where we started from; Islam's goal of world domination.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (34) on this item

Title By Date
Another Lie [35 words]AaronMay 7, 2006 07:25
A French newspaper [141 words]Kees RudolfApr 21, 2006 16:20
Goosa [11 words]RajJul 19, 2009 15:22
Don't over-react to what Fessio thinks he understood what Pope said [165 words]SA FranceApr 5, 2006 10:15
WITHOUT CHRIST [99 words]donvanMar 8, 2006 17:28
Peace [91 words]JumanaMar 7, 2006 23:48
Struggling with Identity of Islam [304 words]PonderingFeb 23, 2006 04:08
Qu'ran or Islam [109 words]tellisMar 16, 2006 20:00
struggling Identity [60 words]observerSep 26, 2006 00:48
Keep dreaming [171 words]NOORFeb 19, 2006 02:12
Hey, then please go back to that and let us be!!! [136 words]AnneMay 6, 2006 12:23
Leave us alone [62 words]Octavio JohansonMay 6, 2006 17:52
version corrected for diplomatic resons? likely [162 words]brunoFeb 6, 2006 15:21
Expounding On Ambiguity? [563 words]orange yonasonJan 31, 2006 16:08
Conspiracies to Control The World [810 words]howlinJan 30, 2006 16:21
kuran and reform [134 words]G.BisvasJan 31, 2006 12:55
Reply to Howlin [353 words]No DhimmiJan 31, 2006 22:07
No Dhimmi [60 words]howlinFeb 1, 2006 12:18
Reforming Barbarians [359 words]orange yonasonFeb 1, 2006 14:22
Howling at Howlin: Learn the Facts [635 words]JoeFeb 14, 2006 22:02
an all out effort [76 words]donvanFeb 21, 2006 13:48
To Joe: [29 words]jeffreybFeb 25, 2006 23:08
reply to Jeffery, here is the proof [52 words]JoeFeb 28, 2006 00:22
To Joe [99 words]jeffreybFeb 28, 2006 16:15
again [666 words]JoeMar 1, 2006 13:25
To Joe [23 words]jeffreybMar 1, 2006 16:40
Does Benedict XVI agree with Ratzinger? [473 words]Tom McLaughlinJan 30, 2006 09:13
⇒ Conditions for Changing Islam [553 words]Mike RamirezJan 29, 2006 18:40
Last chance to turn this around? [284 words]Darwin barrettJan 29, 2006 17:33
The compounding of error [284 words]WilliamJan 29, 2006 09:06
Comments by William [15 words]JerryJan 29, 2006 20:06
oil and women [72 words]yuval brandstetterJan 29, 2006 08:40
why u people see only one side of picture [42 words]Ahsan HussainJan 30, 2006 08:59
Comment to #643 Correction to Pope and the Koran [135 words]William Sumner ScottJan 29, 2006 04:29

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page