Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

documentation
Reader comment on item: Diana and Arab Conspiracy

Submitted by T (United States), Jan 29, 2006 at 10:09

Your excellent documentation throughout your site and organization is so helpful. I haven't even finished your book (about hidden hand); here is high profile example of theme in your article of 1997 that will help me understand your book. Between readings, one can process and react to new events unfolding, as well as percolate some past experiences. Thus, the more I read, the better I can do so, thanks in part to the good documentation and organization of info on your part.

P.S. Quite oddly, I had brushes with conspiracy theorists myself some years back and in one case the "hook" that the people were using against me happened to be the name Adnan Khashoggi, and it was done in mainstream Western press. There was even an Eastern thread among those doing that (Greek, pro-Arab, and pro-Iran) that might have unearthed such a "hook" for the purpose. Although my comments here today don't "contribute to the literature" as I guess the majority of folks do, I thought perhaps you'd find them of interest -- at least for confirming that when someone's education expands through new readings as mine is doing, it helps in understanding the "hidden hand" in one's own personal life, which in turn fortifies one to continue the explorations that help illuminate bigger events.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (24) on this item

Title By Date
Arab conspiracy complex refuses to die [170 words]VijayApr 7, 2008 18:59
G-d Save Phillip....NOT "lady" diana..... [490 words]YnnatchkahFeb 20, 2008 13:09
Diana was definitely murdered [68 words]Momina ZulfiqarNov 18, 2007 08:47
Islamic Law.....A question... [148 words]YnnatchkahFeb 20, 2008 13:17
At Diana inquest, there seems to be a hushed silence when "Middle East" was mentioned. [50 words]michael mullinsApr 22, 2008 21:26
Diana: An arabic-style family game -with sore losers!. [650 words]John DouglasNov 9, 2007 09:21
dirty games [284 words]hannaDec 14, 2007 18:40
The New Religion...better than the old? [396 words]John DouglasFeb 20, 2008 15:16
Wishful Thinking [35 words]athelingSep 10, 2007 20:28
Conspiracy theories [61 words]MontySep 29, 2007 08:21
UK helps further the lie:- The German and Islamic Genocide never existed against Jews in the Holocaust. [371 words]YnnatchkahSep 9, 2007 14:15
WHAT IF A MUSLIM PRINCESS FELL IN LOVE & TO MARRY A NON-MUSLIM? [184 words]TTSSep 8, 2007 01:29
Excellent Point [4 words]YnnatchkahSep 11, 2007 00:58
reply/answer/opinion/comment whatever you say it...... [56 words]vishalJul 6, 2009 12:42
Not Suprising At All On The Arab Conspiracy On Diana And Dodi [97 words]AnneMSep 3, 2007 21:19
Circumstances at the time [385 words]MontySep 1, 2007 10:05
Most culpable man [119 words]VijayAug 31, 2007 10:55
Fathers and their Playboy Son's futures [50 words]AlanSep 1, 2007 13:14
Negligence of Paris town [80 words]RobertFeb 22, 2006 20:25
Response to Robert [111 words]MontySep 1, 2007 08:44
Memorials to Dodi and Diana [23 words]AlanSep 1, 2007 15:00
⇒ documentation [216 words]TJan 29, 2006 10:09
Yes, but... [156 words]PLFeb 17, 2004 10:20
We are unfit to drive, far short of any apparent drunkenness [62 words]MontySep 1, 2007 08:52

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page