Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

The hoax of the promise to Muslim martyrs
Reader comment on item: Pretending Not to Profile Muslims

Submitted by Rick Murray (United States), Jan 29, 2006 at 00:26

Is it not true that (radical) Muslims are promised 72 virgins in heaven as a reward for killing infidels? Let's look at the foolishness of this concept. In heaven there is no need for procreation of a species, therefore no need for seperate genders or sexual activity. We are told in scripture that the wonders of heaven we cannot imagine. So the pleasures of sex are probably irrelevant there. So what good are 72 virgins? Also, to female martyrs, and there have been a few, what kind of incentive is this? Is it not clear that the whole premise of the Islamic afterlife and the means to achieve it is corrupt ...? Nuff said.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (9) on this item

Title By Date
everybody does it [448 words]alex orloSep 12, 2008 15:46
why? [130 words]claraOct 24, 2006 17:34
Citizens? [131 words]GBDAug 29, 2006 04:26
Danish Cartoons [171 words]Fred StraussFeb 1, 2006 14:34
Response to the election of Hamas
[w/response] [339 words]
Mark SilverbergJan 31, 2006 14:33
⇒ The hoax of the promise to Muslim martyrs [114 words]Rick MurrayJan 29, 2006 00:26
It is the duty of law enforcement to question conspirators to murder [92 words]PDMJan 16, 2006 20:51
I don't care... [73 words]Stevan ArnoldDec 27, 2005 00:45
Razor blades [49 words]Arthur GoberDec 26, 2005 17:37

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page