15 readers online now

99,284 comments by 26,351 readers

Go to Mobile Site

POINT clarification
Reader comment on item: Kurt Vonnegut Lauds Suicide Bombers

Submitted by Adam Tate (United States), Jan 27, 2006 at 23:43

The ...comment about Mr. Vonnegut being a "peace activist" is utterly confused.
EXAMPLE: Asked if terrorists are comparable to soldiers, Vonnegut replied: "I regard them as very brave people, yes."
Did he say that what they're doing is right? Or did he simply answer what he was asked, which was, what is the social status of a terrorist compared to that of a soldier?

They're fighting and dying for what they believe in, just like our American soldiers are doing, and that's honorable, is what he said; not that they are in the right in doing so.

Terrorism is wrong, and we all know that, so does Mr. Vonnegut, but it is honorable. Dying for what one believes in is the most honorable thing a person can do. The fact that they may be dying for a mistaken reason is irrelevant, it doesn't take away from their courage and bravery. Terrorists should be recognized for their courage and bravery, not for their ideas. (I don't think I could knowingly kill myself. Therefore I can respect a terrorist ability to do so, yet understand that it is for the wrong reasons.)
One might ask if dropping bombs from a plane is less honorable than sacrificing ones on life.

POINT: Mr. Vonnegut never, by anything he says, does advocate war or violence or anything terrorism supports.
It seems that the "deep end" that Mr. Vonnegut has so tragically fallen into, is too deep for some to understand.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (4) on this item

Title By Date
Vonnegut sheds light, again [186 words]lonesome moderateJun 19, 2006 09:11
The greatest humanist of all [146 words]BradJun 15, 2006 13:32
⇒ POINT clarification [243 words]Adam TateJan 27, 2006 23:43
Vonnegut goes down [78 words]Mike Smith, M.A., of Kelly's Cove, San FranciscoDec 8, 2005 02:36

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premium Links by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.