Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site
Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search

how so?
Reader comment on item: The Causes of Terrorism: It's Not about Money
in response to reader comment: Root Cause Analysis.

Submitted by Reader (United States), Jan 12, 2006 at 12:09

You have to give solid reasons - not give a list and naively hope that people will start believing.

I wasn't attacking you - only your ignorance.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (8) on this item

Title By Date
THE MUSLIM ECONOMIC TRAP: THE CORRELATION OF GOVERNMENT ECONOMIC POWER WITH PRESENT-DAY TERRORISM [82 words]Carol M. FullerJul 11, 2008 16:08
Root Cause Analysis. [957 words]Allen smithJan 9, 2006 20:05
↔ context [163 words]ReaderJan 10, 2006 00:11
↔ Minority and majority in Islam are like anywhere else. But... [155 words]Alain Jean-MairetJan 10, 2006 01:04
↔ Your logic is flawed as well [882 words]Allen smithJan 10, 2006 16:17
↔ ⇒ how so? [26 words]ReaderJan 12, 2006 12:09
Flawed logic [76 words]ReaderJan 9, 2006 07:53
↔ your logic is flawed as well [878 words]allen smithJan 10, 2006 01:31

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page