| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by Rachel Neuwirth (United States), Oct 19, 2002 at 10:58
Whether the so called Palestinian Arab people question of nationality began in 1920 or anytime thereafter makes no difference, as two years after you wrote this article, your prediction shows just that. You wrote, "... the fact that this identity is of such recent and expedient origins suggests that the Palestinian primacy is superficially rooted and that it could eventually come to an end, perhaps as quickly as it got started."Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| Palestinian Nationalism [62 words] | Sarah | Feb 25, 2009 02:04 |
| Please Try To Use Your Mind [115 words] | San Man | Dec 18, 2008 05:25 |
| ↔ Mr. San Man, get an education and stop accepting what uneducated Mullahs invent.... [238 words] | Truth in History | Aug 18, 2009 14:12 |
| all nationalism is superficial...even Israeli [121 words] | russ | Dec 6, 2008 08:26 |
| Did Arabs really envision or strive for an "independent Palestinian state" before 1964? [w/response] [59 words] | DrRJP | Jan 29, 2008 20:55 |
| Attempts to Change History [187 words] | L. | Mar 25, 2005 12:55 |
| ⇒ Once more, your prediction comes true. [85 words] | Rachel Neuwirth | Oct 19, 2002 10:58 |
| Your Historical References are Great! [77 words] | Saul Pfeffer | Jul 2, 2002 11:30 |