Submitted by Reader (United States), Jan 9, 2006 at 07:53
Just because X was himself rich, does NOT mean that he might have had no concern for the economic conditions of his community AT LARGE. The thesis that X does it for getting rich could be false - but not that X might be doing it to address the economic issue. These are two separate arguments. I'm NOT supporting or justifying their extremism or wrong actions - just pointing to the flaw in your own logic.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
Submit a comment on this item
Reader comments (8) on this item
Comment on this item
See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.
|