One reads: "A commitment to engage with them is the only alternative to genocide." I believe this is a false dichotomy.
Suppose there are other choices?
Why should someone be forced to build a bridge when a fence would do? I'm much more prone to fence-building than bridge building...(especially given the fact that you can have NO common ground with Islam...in reality, minus the lies of the Imams, there are NO shared or common values...Islam is a violent culture; one which thrives on violence and wishes to entice others into their ways of thinking...well, I say, separate from them -- have nothing to do with them -- and build a fence.)
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.