Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Undetemined situation
Reader comment on item: Explaining the French Intifada

Submitted by Jean (France), Dec 12, 2005 at 17:52

I'm writing from Paris, I'm French and my appreciation would be as follows.
Apart from islam, the causes of the French riots are basically :
- unreasonnable immigration since the 60's ;
- unemployment, since people get integrated through work ;
- lack of will to adopt the French (or Werstern) way of life on the part of immigrants ;
- demography : many youths means trouble.

All these factors tend to aggravate one another. Islam also plays its part, but not usually in a really religious or ideological sense, but more as a culture. Male domination is critical here. Women from North African origin sometimes succeed very well provided they manage to escape from their community, but that is made difficult by the rigidity of French society. That rigidity is not cultural but social, and is due to socialism. For instance, a successful schoolboy in a bad area cannot move to a better school in another area because of the "scholar map", a system designed to reduce social inequalities but only succeeded in reinforcing them. This is one example among hundreds. So these youths are influenced by islamic way of life even though not all of them are Muslims.

I believe that the French intifada hasn't started yet because these riots lack a real political organization, or even a political agenda, however simplistic. There is not much of it. The rioters don't like the cops, but there isn't much more to it.

Of course, islamisme exists in France and is spreading. There are converts, and islamists preachers target all sorts of institutions, among which the prisons. It is extremely likely that the current social disaster will be exploited at some point, probably in a near future, by better organised people, maybe the islamists themselves but more probably people just a bit more reasonnable that hard-core islamists, just consistent enough to be able to mobilize some rioters, push them towards more violence and finally get some of them killed, so they can have their martyrs and get their revolution going. All that can happen someday, probably during this decace, but that will take a bit of thinking and some smart people. At least smarter than today's islamists, who are completely stupid.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (13) on this item

Title By Date
Le Pen is right about Jews too?
[w/response] [106 words]
Faiz RahmanDec 19, 2005 16:21
Article: "A Mosque Grows In Boston" [31 words]Mike LoPianoDec 19, 2005 13:20
Islamic fanatics will take over the world unless wegrind into the dust, the Saudis and Iran [116 words]Flying thoughtsDec 18, 2005 15:17
watch out [169 words]mattJan 6, 2007 18:31
Trouble in Belgium [393 words]WalterDec 16, 2005 00:33
2005 Onward for Pipes and America [147 words]Thomas Earl CannadyDec 15, 2005 14:25
other American victims of terror
[w/response] [40 words]
Bruce BoymanDec 15, 2005 13:23
Inside the Yutes' Head [92 words]John SobieskiDec 15, 2005 12:13
It's time we wake up! [136 words]asafDec 15, 2005 11:19
to Asaf [195 words]sanaJan 1, 2006 04:20
non-white migrant - comment to filipino liberal [414 words]NewgamersDec 13, 2005 21:50
some observations [568 words]a Filipino liberalDec 13, 2005 04:14
⇒ Undetemined situation [363 words]JeanDec 12, 2005 17:52

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page