As a recent (in the past 7 years or so) convert to Christianity, one of the changes which has come from studying the Bible is in my definition of "peace". Contrary to what a lot of peace "activists" (the rent-a-mobs who come out to rant against "American imperialism" on sunny Saturday afternoons at the Vancouver Art Gallery, e.g.) seem to believe, "peace" does not mean "absence of war".
Rather, if we look through the "historical" part of the Old Testament -- Judges and the books of Samuel, Kings and Chronicles -- peace refers to the condition in which God's laws are followed. When the kings of Israel and Judah "do well in the sight of the Lord", peace ensues. When they "do evil", their enemies run roughshod over them and there is famine and disease. But the periods of peace do not involve an absence of war. Rather, if attacked, the enemies are crushed, despite often-overwhelming odds.
Biblically, the hand-back of land taken when "the enemies were delivered into the hands" of the Israelis in 1967 runs totally counter to the Word of God. What we are looking at -- and what Israeli politicians are learning and the UN refuses to understand -- is the vast difference between appeasement-and-silence and peace-and-quiet.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.