32 readers online now

99,284 comments by 26,351 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Gigantic Monkey Wrench?
Reader comment on item: Bush@U.N.

Submitted by Robert Frank (United States), Sep 25, 2002 at 12:19

I agree wholeheartedly. I think the President is, and has been, on the right track re: Iraq, but his U.N. speech created a possibly gigantic monkey-wrench.

Providing Saddam with a 17th opportunity to do as he has been compelled to do by a litany of U.N. resolutions is ridiculous. The threat that Saddam poses to the world is unquestionable, and his 11-year-long laugh at the U.N. proves that the U.N. is incapable of enforcing its own directives. Why would Bush even open this door for Saddam to do nothing more than buy more time for himself?

What happens when the U.N. has inspectors in Iraq, after months of negotiations, and we decide it's time to do what has to be done? Does the U.N. capitulate to our "regime change" agenda, and pull its inspectors out of the country? I doubt it.

Didn't the quite credible Dr. Hamza talk at length about how close to fruition Saddam's nuclear and other WMD efforts were coming? How much time do we really have?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (9) on this item

Title By Date
Whoops, Guess Not [52 words]stephen smithOct 13, 2005 15:43
Just remember... [84 words]Andea BayneSep 27, 2002 21:58
I'm tired... [176 words]Michale LawandSep 25, 2002 15:52
⇒ Gigantic Monkey Wrench? [169 words]Robert FrankSep 25, 2002 12:19
Perhaps [44 words]Paul M. NevilleSep 22, 2002 21:35
You hit the nail on the head [111 words]Brian McCarthySep 20, 2002 17:57
How many moves ahead? [72 words]Mladen AndrijasevicSep 20, 2002 01:08
Looks like this point has been borne out [195 words]David IseckeSep 18, 2002 15:08
Vindication [16 words]Yospeh MalkinSep 18, 2002 05:57

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premium Links by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.