31 readers online now

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

Bureaucracy as mass movement
Reader comment on article: [Leftist] Globalthink's Perils

Submitted by John J. Olson (United States), Sep 25, 2002 at 10:45

Isn't bureaucracy the fossil of a dead mass movement? In his classic analysis, "The True Believer", Eric Hoffer theorized that mass movements go through three phases. First, the idea, when disgruntled intellectuals spark the movement by discrediting the old power structure; second, the active phase, when fanatics lead the movement; finally, the power structure, when the careerists take charge. In each phase, the leaders promote the mass movement because they correctly believe they have no better way to gain status, wealth, and power.

If you want to be a labor union president today, you don't go to work or even go on strike. You go to law school because labor unions today are bureaucracies, the fossil of a once-vibrant labor union movement.

Today, if you want to promote the social and economic welfare of black people, you don't become an unpaid Freedom Rider opposing tyrannical racial segregation, to the risk of your life and property. You go to work for the EEOC and collect a salary for seizing and doling out opportunities among other people, at no cost or risk to yourself. Civil rights is no longer an ideal, it is a job opportunity for people who can't compete in fields such as heavy industry or high technology.

If you want to heal the sickest people of the world, you might think that working for the World Health Organization would be a good way to go about it. Far from it. In a press release in 1999, WHO declared that six illnesses account for 90% of all infectious disease deaths for people under 44 and that it would cost no more than $20 a person to prevent them yet these diseases caused over 11 million deaths in 1998. Hence, all those deaths could be prevented at the cost of $220 million. That is only 20% of WHO's annual budget and it is less than a third as much as WHO spends on its own administration and its Geneva headquarters. It will never happen as long as WHO is a jobs program for healthy bureaucrats instead of a health program for sick people.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this article

Title By Date

Great Article [101 words]

Johnny Carpati Nov 14, 2005 20:30

Transnational Progressivism Has Infiltrated the GOP and Free Republic [192 words]

Steve Sadlov Jan 5, 2005 13:21

Global economy is like swiss cheese with more holes than cheese [242 words]

Tapart Real News Oct 20, 2003 00:00

Don't forget fanatical secularism [323 words]

Chana Mar 13, 2003 20:54

Why should the world bow to the US' policies? [133 words]

Hugh Barr Oct 1, 2002 07:47

Two points [137 words]

Andrea Bayne Sep 28, 2002 12:16

Only for us [80 words]

Marcus White Sep 27, 2002 16:47

President Bush made his point very clearly [32 words]

Greg Ofiesh Sep 27, 2002 14:23

U.N.: a nice idea but... [36 words]

Andrew Summey Sep 27, 2002 13:25

EQUALITY - discontent in disguise. [135 words]

A Canadian named Lenn Sep 27, 2002 00:33

The views of Dr. Pipes are not welcome in left wing Canada [203 words]

Jeff Bercovitch Sep 26, 2002 09:41

Curious premises [424 words]

Mark Baber Sep 26, 2002 07:06

Let Europe Fight its Own Battes [94 words]

Eugene A. Genovese Sep 26, 2002 01:22

Schism of UN into Oceana and Eastasia... [241 words]

Steven Klon Sep 26, 2002 00:11

Liberal - Modern or Classical? [238 words]

Mark W. Glenn Sep 25, 2002 18:22

Why the appeal??? [315 words]

Howard Veit Sep 25, 2002 18:13

Communist Goals in 1963 Congressional Record [43 words]

C.G. Davis Sep 25, 2002 16:43

Homosexuals will be persecuted, too [127 words]

Steven Malcolm Anderson Sep 25, 2002 14:14

"Transnational Progressivism" or Globalization? [275 words]

Leon Hadar Sep 25, 2002 13:50

⇒ Bureaucracy as mass movement [352 words]

John J. Olson Sep 25, 2002 10:45

Next war - against lethargic monstrous bureaucracies. [97 words]

John B. Jaymes Sep 25, 2002 10:32

Free Association [419 words]

Jean L. Martin (M.A., M.S.S.W.) Sep 25, 2002 09:58

World Tyranny [136 words]

Tom Halley Sep 25, 2002 09:37

Taxation Without Representation [202 words]

Dave Marciniak Sep 25, 2002 08:35

A friendly criticism [129 words]

Joe Willingham Sep 24, 2002 23:28

Globalitarianism [218 words]

C.G. Davis Sep 24, 2002 22:27

It might be worse now~ [199 words]

Lawrence Ricci Sep 24, 2002 22:02

So what is the surprise? [182 words]

Robert Fusfeld Sep 24, 2002 21:43

Welcome To Canada [313 words]

Stephen Bloggins Sep 24, 2002 20:25

Very Perceptive! [61 words]

Paul Tardif Sep 24, 2002 18:58

The Dream Palace of the Liberals [325 words]

Ben Shniper Sep 24, 2002 17:05

And one more thing... [18 words]

Howard Gold Sep 24, 2002 16:12

Add Judicial Overreach to the Perils of Bureaucratic Leftism [516 words]

Andy Steinfeld Sep 24, 2002 15:14

Not just Leftist [263 words]

Glenn Klotz Sep 24, 2002 15:04

Nothing new under the sun. [375 words]

Sheerahkahn Sep 24, 2002 14:26

American ingenuity or Imperial iniative? [129 words]

Mark Feldstein Sep 24, 2002 14:25

"Bureaucratic Leftism" [15 words]

Mordecai J. Gold Sep 24, 2002 14:25

You must be kidding! [114 words]

C Murray Adams Sep 24, 2002 14:15

Bureaucratization of Decision Making [74 words]

Alan Perlmutter Sep 24, 2002 14:06

New World Order [298 words]

Terrall Putnam Sep 24, 2002 14:04

The New World Order [266 words]

Ken Besig Sep 24, 2002 13:19

The Nanny State [102 words]

Dan Schwartz Sep 24, 2002 13:01

Recent NY Post article [21 words]

norman rush Sep 24, 2002 10:32

Comment on [Leftist] Globalthink's Perils

Name
Email Address (optional)

Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:

Mark my comment as a response to Bureaucracy as mass movement by reader John J. Olson

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Click here to see the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS