32 readers online now

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

New World Order
Reader comment on article: [Leftist] Globalthink's Perils

Submitted by Terrall Putnam (United States), Sep 24, 2002 at 14:04

Hello, Hello,
Is anyone else out there listening to what Dr. Pipes is saying. Seriously folks, I know many of you are and I am probably "preaching to the Choir" but He is absolutely correct. It didn't start with the solidier who was being drummed out of the Army for not wearing a UN flag and a light blue beret, instead of the Red White and Blue that to which he swore allegiance. This is just the point where I became keenly aware of our Democrat Leftist Leaders wanting to hand responsibility and power to the UN for everything.

IF I had voted for one of these clowns I'd be too ashamed to admit it .

I would also be calling them asking why they ran for office if they don't have the guts to make the tough decisions.

Tom Daschle, are you listening pal? Get some guts and back our President. Don't you know that you, and your stonewalling democrat friends in Congress look like a bunch of Yellow Bellied, Cowards. You call President George W. Bush a Cowboy. Thank you very much! They called Ronald Reagan a Cowboy, and he wouldn't take any nonsense from Terrorists either. Osama bin Laden may be dead. If so, good!

Now Saddam Hussein is trying to make weapons of mass destruction and what are the Dems saying? "Well lets just wait and see, It might not be all that bad". What are you idiots thinking???

Get back in Session and back the President or come November, watch smart, informed Americans, yes we are, and we vote, Vote your pansy butts right out of office!

Get back to work and by the way, Quit worrying about raising your pay and get busy doing something to save full term babies, and Social Security.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this article

Title By Date

Great Article [101 words]

Johnny Carpati Nov 14, 2005 20:30

Transnational Progressivism Has Infiltrated the GOP and Free Republic [192 words]

Steve Sadlov Jan 5, 2005 13:21

Global economy is like swiss cheese with more holes than cheese [242 words]

Tapart Real News Oct 20, 2003 00:00

Don't forget fanatical secularism [323 words]

Chana Mar 13, 2003 20:54

Why should the world bow to the US' policies? [133 words]

Hugh Barr Oct 1, 2002 07:47

Two points [137 words]

Andrea Bayne Sep 28, 2002 12:16

Only for us [80 words]

Marcus White Sep 27, 2002 16:47

President Bush made his point very clearly [32 words]

Greg Ofiesh Sep 27, 2002 14:23

U.N.: a nice idea but... [36 words]

Andrew Summey Sep 27, 2002 13:25

EQUALITY - discontent in disguise. [135 words]

A Canadian named Lenn Sep 27, 2002 00:33

The views of Dr. Pipes are not welcome in left wing Canada [203 words]

Jeff Bercovitch Sep 26, 2002 09:41

Curious premises [424 words]

Mark Baber Sep 26, 2002 07:06

Let Europe Fight its Own Battes [94 words]

Eugene A. Genovese Sep 26, 2002 01:22

Schism of UN into Oceana and Eastasia... [241 words]

Steven Klon Sep 26, 2002 00:11

Liberal - Modern or Classical? [238 words]

Mark W. Glenn Sep 25, 2002 18:22

Why the appeal??? [315 words]

Howard Veit Sep 25, 2002 18:13

Communist Goals in 1963 Congressional Record [43 words]

C.G. Davis Sep 25, 2002 16:43

Homosexuals will be persecuted, too [127 words]

Steven Malcolm Anderson Sep 25, 2002 14:14

"Transnational Progressivism" or Globalization? [275 words]

Leon Hadar Sep 25, 2002 13:50

Bureaucracy as mass movement [352 words]

John J. Olson Sep 25, 2002 10:45

Next war - against lethargic monstrous bureaucracies. [97 words]

John B. Jaymes Sep 25, 2002 10:32

Free Association [419 words]

Jean L. Martin (M.A., M.S.S.W.) Sep 25, 2002 09:58

World Tyranny [136 words]

Tom Halley Sep 25, 2002 09:37

Taxation Without Representation [202 words]

Dave Marciniak Sep 25, 2002 08:35

A friendly criticism [129 words]

Joe Willingham Sep 24, 2002 23:28

Globalitarianism [218 words]

C.G. Davis Sep 24, 2002 22:27

It might be worse now~ [199 words]

Lawrence Ricci Sep 24, 2002 22:02

So what is the surprise? [182 words]

Robert Fusfeld Sep 24, 2002 21:43

Welcome To Canada [313 words]

Stephen Bloggins Sep 24, 2002 20:25

Very Perceptive! [61 words]

Paul Tardif Sep 24, 2002 18:58

The Dream Palace of the Liberals [325 words]

Ben Shniper Sep 24, 2002 17:05

And one more thing... [18 words]

Howard Gold Sep 24, 2002 16:12

Add Judicial Overreach to the Perils of Bureaucratic Leftism [516 words]

Andy Steinfeld Sep 24, 2002 15:14

Not just Leftist [263 words]

Glenn Klotz Sep 24, 2002 15:04

Nothing new under the sun. [375 words]

Sheerahkahn Sep 24, 2002 14:26

American ingenuity or Imperial iniative? [129 words]

Mark Feldstein Sep 24, 2002 14:25

"Bureaucratic Leftism" [15 words]

Mordecai J. Gold Sep 24, 2002 14:25

You must be kidding! [114 words]

C Murray Adams Sep 24, 2002 14:15

Bureaucratization of Decision Making [74 words]

Alan Perlmutter Sep 24, 2002 14:06

⇒ New World Order [298 words]

Terrall Putnam Sep 24, 2002 14:04

The New World Order [266 words]

Ken Besig Sep 24, 2002 13:19

The Nanny State [102 words]

Dan Schwartz Sep 24, 2002 13:01

Recent NY Post article [21 words]

norman rush Sep 24, 2002 10:32

Comment on [Leftist] Globalthink's Perils

Name
Email Address (optional)

Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:

Mark my comment as a response to New World Order by reader Terrall Putnam

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Click here to see the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS