Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

New World Order
Reader comment on item: [Leftist] Globalthink's Perils

Submitted by Terrall Putnam (United States), Sep 24, 2002 at 14:04

Hello, Hello,
Is anyone else out there listening to what Dr. Pipes is saying. Seriously folks, I know many of you are and I am probably "preaching to the Choir" but He is absolutely correct. It didn't start with the solidier who was being drummed out of the Army for not wearing a UN flag and a light blue beret, instead of the Red White and Blue that to which he swore allegiance. This is just the point where I became keenly aware of our Democrat Leftist Leaders wanting to hand responsibility and power to the UN for everything.

IF I had voted for one of these clowns I'd be too ashamed to admit it .

I would also be calling them asking why they ran for office if they don't have the guts to make the tough decisions.

Tom Daschle, are you listening pal? Get some guts and back our President. Don't you know that you, and your stonewalling democrat friends in Congress look like a bunch of Yellow Bellied, Cowards. You call President George W. Bush a Cowboy. Thank you very much! They called Ronald Reagan a Cowboy, and he wouldn't take any nonsense from Terrorists either. Osama bin Laden may be dead. If so, good!

Now Saddam Hussein is trying to make weapons of mass destruction and what are the Dems saying? "Well lets just wait and see, It might not be all that bad". What are you idiots thinking???

Get back in Session and back the President or come November, watch smart, informed Americans, yes we are, and we vote, Vote your pansy butts right out of office!

Get back to work and by the way, Quit worrying about raising your pay and get busy doing something to save full term babies, and Social Security.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (44) on this item

Title By Date
Great Article [101 words]Johnny CarpatiNov 14, 2005 20:30
Transnational Progressivism Has Infiltrated the GOP and Free Republic [192 words]Steve SadlovJan 5, 2005 13:21
Global economy is like swiss cheese with more holes than cheese [242 words]Tapart Real NewsOct 20, 2003 00:00
Don't forget fanatical secularism [323 words]ChanaMar 13, 2003 20:54
Why should the world bow to the US' policies? [133 words]Hugh BarrOct 1, 2002 07:47
No ones asking anyone to "bow" to the US [147 words]BillBixbySep 7, 2009 08:10
Two points [137 words]Andrea BayneSep 28, 2002 12:16
Only for us [80 words]Marcus WhiteSep 27, 2002 16:47
President Bush made his point very clearly [32 words]Greg OfieshSep 27, 2002 14:23
U.N.: a nice idea but... [36 words]Andrew SummeySep 27, 2002 13:25
EQUALITY - discontent in disguise. [135 words]A Canadian named LennSep 27, 2002 00:33
The views of Dr. Pipes are not welcome in left wing Canada [203 words]Jeff BercovitchSep 26, 2002 09:41
Curious premises [424 words]Mark BaberSep 26, 2002 07:06
Let Europe Fight its Own Battes [94 words]Eugene A. GenoveseSep 26, 2002 01:22
Schism of UN into Oceana and Eastasia... [241 words]Steven KlonSep 26, 2002 00:11
Liberal - Modern or Classical? [238 words]Mark W. GlennSep 25, 2002 18:22
Why the appeal??? [315 words]Howard VeitSep 25, 2002 18:13
Communist Goals in 1963 Congressional Record [43 words]C.G. DavisSep 25, 2002 16:43
Homosexuals will be persecuted, too [127 words]Steven Malcolm AndersonSep 25, 2002 14:14
"Transnational Progressivism" or Globalization? [275 words]Leon HadarSep 25, 2002 13:50
Bureaucracy as mass movement [352 words]John J. OlsonSep 25, 2002 10:45
Next war - against lethargic monstrous bureaucracies. [97 words]John B. JaymesSep 25, 2002 10:32
Free Association [419 words]Jean L. Martin (M.A., M.S.S.W.)Sep 25, 2002 09:58
World Tyranny [136 words]Tom HalleySep 25, 2002 09:37
Taxation Without Representation [202 words]Dave MarciniakSep 25, 2002 08:35
A friendly criticism [129 words]Joe WillinghamSep 24, 2002 23:28
Globalitarianism [218 words]C.G. DavisSep 24, 2002 22:27
It might be worse now~ [199 words]Lawrence RicciSep 24, 2002 22:02
So what is the surprise? [182 words]Robert FusfeldSep 24, 2002 21:43
Welcome To Canada [313 words]Stephen BlogginsSep 24, 2002 20:25
Very Perceptive! [61 words]Paul TardifSep 24, 2002 18:58
The Dream Palace of the Liberals [325 words]Ben ShniperSep 24, 2002 17:05
And one more thing... [18 words]Howard GoldSep 24, 2002 16:12
Add Judicial Overreach to the Perils of Bureaucratic Leftism [516 words]Andy SteinfeldSep 24, 2002 15:14
Not just Leftist [263 words]Glenn KlotzSep 24, 2002 15:04
Nothing new under the sun. [375 words]SheerahkahnSep 24, 2002 14:26
American ingenuity or Imperial iniative? [129 words]Mark FeldsteinSep 24, 2002 14:25
"Bureaucratic Leftism" [15 words]Mordecai J. GoldSep 24, 2002 14:25
You must be kidding! [114 words]C Murray AdamsSep 24, 2002 14:15
Bureaucratization of Decision Making [74 words]Alan PerlmutterSep 24, 2002 14:06
⇒ New World Order [298 words]Terrall PutnamSep 24, 2002 14:04
The New World Order [266 words]Ken BesigSep 24, 2002 13:19
The Nanny State [102 words]Dan SchwartzSep 24, 2002 13:01
Recent NY Post article [21 words]norman rushSep 24, 2002 10:32

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page