69 million page views
You're invited: Join Daniel Pipes & MEF on a fact-finding mission
to Poland, Hungary & Austria. For more information, click here

At least four genders

Reader comment on item: Why Do You American Conservatives Keep Losing?

Submitted by Stein (United States), Nov 15, 2018 at 12:50

The claim that 'traditional' cultures only have '2 genders', seems inaccurate.

For example, in traditional (Rabbinic) Jewish cultures recognize at least four gender categories:
• zakhar (male)
• nkeva (female)
• androginos (both male and female)
• tumtum (neither male nor female)

All four categories of gender have an honorable place within the indigenous Jewish legal system, Halakha.

Arguably, there are even more categories of gender in Rabbinic tradition, such as elonit in the sense of a male-like female. And so on.

Around the world, it seems typical for conservative ancient cultures to recognize the presence of individuals who defy a male-versus-female structural simplification.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Why Conservatives Lose [169 words]Jim AustinNov 26, 2018 03:37246251
The real fruit of the "Age of Enlightenment" [218 words]Michael SNov 30, 2018 14:09246251
Imperialism, Slavery and "Enlightenment" [494 words]Michael SNov 30, 2018 22:18246251
Why Conservatives Lose [365 words]Jim AustinDec 1, 2018 00:18246251
The hidden trap of "reason" [341 words]Michael SDec 3, 2018 17:27246251
At least four genders [104 words]SteinNov 15, 2018 12:50246007
"Queers", "Eunuchs", etc. [322 words]Michael SDec 5, 2018 10:14246007
Standardization versus Innovation [216 words]SteinNov 2, 2018 12:35245770
Republicans not Conservatives Control [96 words]Tom DundeeOct 25, 2018 14:11245696
So why deliver our children 'over to liberals to be inculcated' [26 words]ebOct 21, 2018 09:06245609
Conservatism of today was the liberalism of the past [100 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Amir SaniOct 18, 2018 10:13245539
Our dear Amir needs to read with care! [238 words]dhimmi no moreOct 19, 2018 06:11245539
Response to Dhimmi no more [192 words]Amir SaniOct 21, 2018 22:56245539
Our dear Amir needs to read with care! Part 2 [374 words]dhimmi no moreOct 22, 2018 14:56245539
Our dear Amir needs to read with care! Part 3 [117 words]dhimmi no moreOct 22, 2018 15:13245539
So depressing. [11 words]Mark AlexanderOct 18, 2018 02:07245529
Conservatism vs. Liberalism [30 words]Shafi RefaiOct 18, 2018 01:11245527
Our dear Shafi Refai needs to watch Jordan Peterson! [111 words]dhimmi no moreOct 19, 2018 06:27245527

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to At least four genders by Stein

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2018 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)