Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Pakistan
Reader comment on item: Pakistan and Saudi Arabia: On Whose Side?

Submitted by Donald W. Bales (United States), Jul 29, 2005 at 10:04

The radicals are exploiting a religious revival in the Muslim world. They are using the religious fervor of some of their unenlightened members to fuel their activities. There is no opposing religious fervor in the West, especially in Europe that is post-Christian. A good proportion of the U.S. population is unchurched, un-Christian in heart, even though they may be nominal Christians. And we have a sizable group who are actively and openly anti-Christian (and anti-Jew as well although it is not quite so obvious except in the case of Israel).

The struggle, however, is not religious, but political and it is the thirst for power that drives the leadership-just as it was with the Nazis and the Communists.

The only remedy, unfortunately, is having the will to continue this war-World War IV-as long as it takes to defeat these evil forces. They are evil even though they pretend to be in the name of Allah. What sort of God would use such tactics? Perhaps the God of the Old Testament, but not of the new. If the Muslims believe Jesus was a prophet, they have rejected his message.
Some think that the God of the Muslims would use such tactics, but, if so, must be a false God.
My concern is that so many U.S. citizens do not realize what is going on and do not take it seriously.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (28) on this item

Title By Date
If our commander tells us to blow up our own parents we'll do it. We never spare anyone. [940 words]PeacemakerJun 26, 2009 07:06
Azzam Tamimi was brave and honest [236 words]Chris HoerstelMay 16, 2008 08:30
lets crush Terrorism with iron hand... [660 words]IndianDec 4, 2008 01:33
Israel and USA will help Europe to fight the Jehadis within and around Europe... [164 words]Freedon and Peace...Dec 6, 2008 10:03
Change the perspective from negative to positive [213 words]Kathie HarrisonSep 25, 2006 13:57
kudos [94 words]JamesMar 8, 2006 01:19
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia: On Whose Side? Art. No.2812 [76 words]S.C.PandaAug 22, 2005 06:09
Response to Batya: Lessons in history [19 words]Dan StraussAug 3, 2005 15:50
Thanks Monica [18 words]Debra M.Aug 2, 2005 11:59
Latest Report of 55 Terrorist Training Camps in Pakistan [23 words]Swahili DinazJul 31, 2005 02:38
Realistic View [110 words]Muhammad Ather ShehzadDec 17, 2008 02:35
Fighting Daniel Pipes ( and his moderator) [125 words]Binyamin KalimJul 30, 2005 21:45
e mail to Monica Crowley [73 words]roy BishkoJul 30, 2005 19:41
Obama [7 words]anonymousMar 19, 2008 14:50
America and West have a big problem [263 words]F.ShawkiJul 30, 2005 18:56
Partial Amnesia [954 words]Swahili DinazJul 30, 2005 14:23
Islamists and the West [762 words]NariJul 29, 2005 21:57
Fear from Islam [211 words]khanFeb 25, 2007 23:04
URDU [157 words]batya daganJul 29, 2005 17:29
Not Ad Hominem [86 words]Ben ShniperJul 29, 2005 16:51
Monica was simply fabuloso! [257 words]Judy MorrisJul 29, 2005 13:22
Tamimi vs Crowley [220 words]Steven LJul 29, 2005 12:43
Bravo! [87 words]jon sloanJul 29, 2005 12:16
MSNBC: Monica Crowley/Tamimi/You [63 words]Kathryn DrakeJul 29, 2005 10:52
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia [262 words]Vijay DandapaniJul 29, 2005 10:33
Tamimi is a Doctor? Of What? [396 words]GWKJul 29, 2005 10:09
⇒ Pakistan [226 words]Donald W. BalesJul 29, 2005 10:04
What happens if..... [546 words]WernerJul 28, 2005 23:11

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page