27 readers online now

98,675 comments by 26,222 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

What happens if.....
Reader comment on item: Pakistan and Saudi Arabia: On Whose Side?

Submitted by Werner (United States), Jul 28, 2005 at 23:11

the USA puts more demands on crack down on Saudi Arabia?

1. Saudi ignores it and plays it game as usual. What kind of leverage does the USA have?

2. Saudi really try to crack down, it uproots a hell and there is civil war in Saudi. Given the position over the holy sites of Muslim what is going to happen, who is going to win, what is the US going to do when there is civil war? Can they engage in a territory considered holy to many Muslim? With which repercussions?

3. The Saudis put their faith into radical Islam (I guess they do that anyway already today), what is the US going to do? Invade? Sanctions? UN? It seems they are not in such a nice position to do all this things. If they demand and pose a threat then they may have to back it up, but for what price? Is there a movement for secular democracy in Saudi? produce a civil war Shias against Wahabis? What would be the realistic choices the US has? Have China haywired because of the oil with its current threats and North Korea with all that nuclear stuff?

The same is with Pakistan. One doesn't have to like Musharaf (I personally think he is not too bad, after all he is military and they are not so different all around the world) but what other options does the US have?

Pakistan has nuclear weapons that is a prize all the jihadis want to have.

So what to do with Pakistan?

Keep Musharaf and continue what the US did in the past. Is that going to work? Obviously Musharaf did escape all assasination attempts in a very volatile and treacherous environment. That means he is no fool. That means he is capabable of something. Musharaf put a great portion of trust (out of pressure or not I don't ask) into the US and the US supports him. Obviously the terrorist/islamist side is after him that means they see that similarly. What is he really doing for the US? Why is he a worthy partner (or is he the best option you can get of many choices you fear are worse?) .

My brother who is a pilot in the german army (and they have good connection among themselves) told me that german forces in Afghanistan were up to 500 yards to OBL to capture him but were called back by american senior officers. Recently I heard a comment from a US government official that they have a pretty good idea were OBL is. Assumed both information are true that led me to the conclusion that Musharaf may have some problems if OBL is caught. On second thaughts if OBL really wanted to kill Musharaf with all the resources available to him Musharaf would be dead by now. That means something fishy is going on.

But what if the US thinks, Musharaf is a traitor what do they do? Kick him out of office and then what? Call for elections? Have an OBL deputy in charge of Pakistan? Invade Pakistan? call the Indians to that? What realistic options does the US have in Pakistan?

I do think the US is doing the best it can. Put reasonable demands on him and support him as much as deemed good.

greetings

Werner

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (28) on this item

Title By Date
If our commander tells us to blow up our own parents we'll do it. We never spare anyone. [940 words]PeacemakerJun 26, 2009 07:06
Azzam Tamimi was brave and honest [236 words]Chris HoerstelMay 16, 2008 08:30
lets crush Terrorism with iron hand... [660 words]IndianDec 4, 2008 01:33
Israel and USA will help Europe to fight the Jehadis within and around Europe... [164 words]Freedon and Peace...Dec 6, 2008 10:03
Change the perspective from negative to positive [213 words]Kathie HarrisonSep 25, 2006 13:57
kudos [94 words]JamesMar 8, 2006 01:19
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia: On Whose Side? Art. No.2812 [76 words]S.C.PandaAug 22, 2005 06:09
Response to Batya: Lessons in history [19 words]Dan StraussAug 3, 2005 15:50
Thanks Monica [18 words]Debra M.Aug 2, 2005 11:59
Latest Report of 55 Terrorist Training Camps in Pakistan [23 words]Swahili DinazJul 31, 2005 02:38
Realistic View [110 words]Muhammad Ather ShehzadDec 17, 2008 02:35
Fighting Daniel Pipes ( and his moderator) [125 words]Binyamin KalimJul 30, 2005 21:45
e mail to Monica Crowley [73 words]roy BishkoJul 30, 2005 19:41
Obama [7 words]anonymousMar 19, 2008 14:50
America and West have a big problem [263 words]F.ShawkiJul 30, 2005 18:56
Partial Amnesia [954 words]Swahili DinazJul 30, 2005 14:23
Islamists and the West [762 words]NariJul 29, 2005 21:57
Fear from Islam [211 words]khanFeb 25, 2007 23:04
URDU [157 words]batya daganJul 29, 2005 17:29
Not Ad Hominem [86 words]Ben ShniperJul 29, 2005 16:51
Monica was simply fabuloso! [257 words]Judy MorrisJul 29, 2005 13:22
Tamimi vs Crowley [220 words]Steven LJul 29, 2005 12:43
Bravo! [87 words]jon sloanJul 29, 2005 12:16
MSNBC: Monica Crowley/Tamimi/You [63 words]Kathryn DrakeJul 29, 2005 10:52
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia [262 words]Vijay DandapaniJul 29, 2005 10:33
Tamimi is a Doctor? Of What? [396 words]GWKJul 29, 2005 10:09
Pakistan [226 words]Donald W. BalesJul 29, 2005 10:04
⇒ What happens if..... [546 words]WernerJul 28, 2005 23:11

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.